TY - CHAP
T1 - Tools and Modalities for Postural Ergonomics Research in Surgery and Neurosurgery
AU - Mavrovounis, Georgios
AU - Meling, Torstein R
AU - Lafuente, Jesus
AU - Fountas, Konstantinos N
AU - Demetriades, Andreas K
N1 - © 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are common amongst neurosurgeons and can affect a surgeon's ability to operate. Performing surgical ergonomics research is important to minimize the prevalence and effect of WMSDs on the surgeons. The aim of this review is to highlight some of the most important objective and subjective tools available for surgical ergonomics research. Subjective tools can be divided into three categories: (1) questionnaires (either validated or non-validated) filled out by the participants, (2) survey assessments/standardized scoring systems filled out by the researchers, and (3) video analysis. Subjective tools have the drawbacks of recall bias and intra-rater and inter-rater variability. Some of the most important objective tools available are surface electromyography, force plate/pressure sensors analysis, inertial measurement units (IMUs) and kinematics data capturing using reflective markers. Although these modalities do not have the drawbacks that hinder the use of subjective tools, using most of them in the real-life operating theatre, with the exception of IMUs, is challenging. Conducting surgical ergonomics research is important to optimize the performance of neurosurgeons. The advancements towards wearable, wireless technologies will make it easier for surgeons to perform ergonomics research in the operating room.
AB - Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are common amongst neurosurgeons and can affect a surgeon's ability to operate. Performing surgical ergonomics research is important to minimize the prevalence and effect of WMSDs on the surgeons. The aim of this review is to highlight some of the most important objective and subjective tools available for surgical ergonomics research. Subjective tools can be divided into three categories: (1) questionnaires (either validated or non-validated) filled out by the participants, (2) survey assessments/standardized scoring systems filled out by the researchers, and (3) video analysis. Subjective tools have the drawbacks of recall bias and intra-rater and inter-rater variability. Some of the most important objective tools available are surface electromyography, force plate/pressure sensors analysis, inertial measurement units (IMUs) and kinematics data capturing using reflective markers. Although these modalities do not have the drawbacks that hinder the use of subjective tools, using most of them in the real-life operating theatre, with the exception of IMUs, is challenging. Conducting surgical ergonomics research is important to optimize the performance of neurosurgeons. The advancements towards wearable, wireless technologies will make it easier for surgeons to perform ergonomics research in the operating room.
KW - Humans
KW - Neurosurgery
KW - Neurosurgical Procedures
KW - Neurosurgeons
KW - Ergonomics
KW - Wearable Electronic Devices
KW - Work-related musculoskeletal disorders
KW - Inertial measurement units
KW - Surface electromyography
KW - Ergonomics research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85180881541&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-36084-8_4
DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-36084-8_4
M3 - Book chapter
C2 - 38153443
T3 - Acta Neurochirurgica, Supplement
SP - 15
EP - 20
BT - The Funnel: From the Skull Base to the Sacrum
PB - Springer
ER -