Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Time to dismiss the idea of a structural fix within government? An analysis of intersectoral action for health in Danish municipalities

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. A three-year national follow-up study on the development of community-level cancer rehabilitation in Denmark

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Tramadol prescribed use in general and chronic noncancer pain: A nationwide register-based cohort study of all adults age 16+ years

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Role of disease and demographic factors as determinants of return migration: A nationwide register-based cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Criterion validity of the Physical Activity Scale (PAS2) in Danish adults

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Associations of school tobacco policies and legislation with youth smoking: a cross-sectional study of Danish vocational high schools

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. The role of managers in addressing employees with musculoskeletal pain: a mixed methods study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Aims: This paper examines the role of organizational structure within government(s) in attempts to implement intersectoral action for health in Danish municipalities. We discuss the implications of structural reorganization and the governance structures that are established in order to ensure coordination and integration between policy sectors. Methods: The paper is based on 49 interviews with civil servants from health and non-health sectors of 10 municipalities. Based on participants’ experiences, cases have been described and analyzed in an iterative process consulting the literature on Health in All Policies and joined-up government. Results: Continuous and frequent processes of reorganizing were widespread in the municipalities. However, they appeared to have little effect on policy change. The two most common governance structures established to transcend organizational boundaries were the central unit and the intersectoral committee. According to the experiences of participants, paradoxically both of these organizational solutions tend to reproduce the organizational problems they are intended to overcome. Even if structural reorganization may succeed in dissolving some sector boundaries, it will inevitably create new ones. Conclusions: It is time to dismiss the idea that intersectoral action for health can be achieved by means of a structural fix. Rather than rearranging organizational boundaries it may be more useful to seek to manage the silos which exist in any organization, e.g. by promoting awareness of their implications for public health action and by enhancing the boundary spanning skills of public health officers.

Original languageEnglish
JournalScandinavian Journal of Public Health
Volume46
Issue number22 suppl
Pages (from-to)48-57
Number of pages10
ISSN1403-4948
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2018
Externally publishedYes

    Research areas

  • boundary spanning, Health in All Policies, Intersectoral action for health, intersectoral governance, joined-up government, local government, municipalities, organization structure

ID: 57247094