Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Thresholds for clinical importance were established to improve interpretation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in clinical practice and research

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Consideration of confounding was suboptimal in the reporting of observational studies in psychiatry: a meta-epidemiological study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Overall bias and sample sizes were unchanged in ICU trials over time: a meta-epidemiological study

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  3. Transparent and systematic reporting of meta-epidemiological studies

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Apparently conclusive meta-analyses on interventions in critical care may be inconclusive - a meta-epidemiological study

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  • EORTC Quality of Life Group
View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to establish thresholds for clinical importance (TCIs) for the five functioning and nine symptom scales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30).

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: In this diagnostic study, cancer patients with mixed diagnoses and treatments completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and anchored the questions in each domain in terms of their clinical importance. The anchor questions, concerned limitations in daily life, need for help/care, and the worries of the patient and his/her partner/family. These questions allowed categorizing patients into whether they exhibited a clinically important symptom/functional impairment for each scale and performing a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to establish TCIs.

RESULTS: Data from 498 patients from six European countries (mean age 60.4 years, 55.2% women) were analyzed. For the TCIs generated using the patient questionnaire data, the EORTC QLQ-C30 scales showed sensitivity values between 0.71 and 0.97 and specificity values between 0.62 and 0.92 (area under the curve above 0.80 for all scales).

CONCLUSION: This EORTC Quality of Life Group study provides TCIs for the functioning and symptom scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30. These TCIs can increase the interpretability of the questionnaire results and foster its use in daily clinical practice and in clinical research.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume118
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
ISSN0895-4356
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2020

ID: 58891122