Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
The Capital Region of Denmark's Research Portal Home
Help & FAQ
Dansk
English
Home
Hospitals/departments
Researchers
Research output
Activities
Prizes
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Three pitfalls of accountable healthcare rationing
Marleen Eijkholt, Marike Broekman, Naci Balak,
Tiit Mathiesen
*
, EANS Ethico-legal committee
*
Corresponding author for this work
Department of Neurosurgery
13
Citations (Scopus)
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Three pitfalls of accountable healthcare rationing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Clinical Judgment
100%
Rationing
100%
Medical Needs
100%
Resource Allocation
100%
Health Care Rationing
100%
Value Judgments
100%
Treatment Allocation
50%
Healthcare Resources
50%
Patient Needs
50%
Conflict of Interest
50%
Triage
50%
Caregivers
50%
Medical Decision
50%
Medical Devices
50%
Ethics
50%
Resource Needs
50%
Health Care Delivery
50%
Fair Treatment
50%
Optimal Resource Allocation
50%
Professional Caregivers
50%
Public Acceptance
50%
Medical Resources
50%
Professional Commitment
50%
Fundamental Care
50%
Ethical Bias
50%
Sustainable Healthcare
50%
Ethical Judgment
50%
Sudden Imbalance
50%
Moral Agency
50%
Hidden Values
50%
Nursing and Health Professions
Health Care Organization
100%
Resource Allocation
100%
Triage
50%
Health Care Delivery
50%
Psychology
Resource Allocation
100%
Caregiver
50%
Decision Making
50%
Conflict of Interest
50%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Allocation
100%
Rationing
100%
Medicine and Dentistry
Decision Making
100%
Triage
16%
Neuroscience
Decision-Making
100%