Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

The updated Cochrane review 2014 on GnRH agonist trigger: repeating the same errors

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Meditation and mindfulness reduce perceived stress in women with recurrent pregnancy loss: a randomized controlled trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Stress and depression among women and men who have experienced recurrent pregnancy loss: focusing on both sexes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Empathetic application of machine learning may address appropriate utilization of ART

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Futures and fears in the freezer: Danish women's experiences with ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. The reproductive microbiome - clinical practice recommendations for fertility specialists

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Proteome of fluid from human ovarian small antral follicles reveals insights in folliculogenesis and oocyte maturation

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. N-acetylcysteine protects ovarian follicles from ischemia-reperfusion injury in xenotransplanted human ovarian tissue

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Umbilical cord blood-derived platelet-rich plasma: a clinically acceptable substitute for fetal bovine serum?

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

  4. Parental Acceptance Rate of Testicular Tissue Cryopreservation in Danish Boys with Cryptorchidism

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Biological and Clinical Rationale for Androgen Priming in Ovarian Stimulation

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  • Shahar Kol
  • Peter Humaidan
  • Birgit Alsbjerg
  • Lawrence Engmann
  • Claudio Benadiva
  • Juan A García-Velasco
  • Human Fatemi
  • Claus Yding Andersen
View graph of relations

Cochrane reviews are powerful tools, internationally recognized as the highest standard in evidence-based health care. A Cochrane analysis makes use of precise, reproducible criteria in the selection of studies for review. In the context of a previous Cochrane review (2010) on the subject of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger, we questioned whether a review should be conducted during the research phase when new concepts are being developed. Recently, an updated Cochrane review was published, reaching the same general conclusion as the first one, i.e., GnRHa triggers lower the chance of pregnancy in fresh autologous IVF and intracytoplasmic injection treatment cycles. We argue that the new review repeats previous errors by compiling data from studies that were not comparable as different luteal phase protocols were used. From the clinical point of view, the luteal support used is the variable which affects the pregnancy rate and not the use of the GnRHa trigger for final oocyte maturation. Therefore, a meaningful comparison between GnRHa and HCG trigger must be confined to outcome measures that are not affected by the luteal support used. We conclude that the updated review falls short of addressing meaningful clinical and fundamental questions in the context of GnRHa trigger.

Original languageEnglish
JournalReproductive BioMedicine Online
Volume30
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)563-5
Number of pages3
ISSN1472-6483
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2015

ID: 46037805