Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

The unifying diagnostic construct of bodily distress syndrome (BDS) was confirmed in the general population

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Do patients with ICD who report anxiety symptoms on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale suffer from anxiety?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. RIFD - A brief clinical research interview for functional somatic disorders and health anxiety

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Longing for existential recognition : A qualitative study of everyday concerns for people with severe somatoform disorders

    Research output: Contribution to journalConference abstract in journalResearchpeer-review

  1. Changes in subtypes of overt thyrotoxicosis and hypothyroidism following iodine fortification

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Determinants for symptomatic gallstone disease readmissions - results from a cohort with screen-detected gallstone disease

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVES: Bodily distress syndrome (BDS) has been shown to encompass a range of functional somatic syndromes (FSS) such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), fibromyalgia (FM), and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in clinical samples. This study aimed to explore symptom clusters and test classification of individuals with illness similar to the BDS criteria in a general population sample.

METHODS: A stratified subsample of 1590 individuals from the DanFunD part two cohort was included. Symptoms were assessed with the Research Interview for Functional somatic Disorders, performed by trained physicians. In 44 symptoms pooled from criteria of IBS, FM, CFS, and BDS, symptom clusters were explored with explorative factor analysis. Confirmation of symptom clusters of BDS in the previously described 25- and 30-item BDS checklists was performed with confirmatory factor analysis. Classification of individuals into illness groups was investigated with latent class analysis.

RESULTS: Four symptom clusters (cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, general symptoms/fatigue) corresponding to the BDS subtypes and their corresponding FSS were identified and confirmed. A three-class model including 25 BDS items had the best fit for dividing participants into classes of illness: One class with low probability, one class with medium probability, and one class with high probability of having ≥4 symptoms in all symptom clusters.

CONCLUSION: The BDS concept was confirmed in the general population and constitutes a promising approach for improved FSS classification. It is highly clinical relevant being the only diagnostic construct defining the complex multi-organ type.

Original languageEnglish
Article number109868
JournalJournal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume128
Pages (from-to)109868
ISSN0022-3999
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020

ID: 58485339