Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

The rise and fall of the world's first fat tax

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. The unifying diagnostic construct of bodily distress syndrome (BDS) was confirmed in the general population

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Changes in subtypes of overt thyrotoxicosis and hypothyroidism following iodine fortification

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. New Tobacco Products Do Not Protect Public Health

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  4. Children as visionary change agents in Danish school health promotion

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Determinants for symptomatic gallstone disease readmissions - results from a cohort with screen-detected gallstone disease

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

In 2011, Denmark introduced the world's first tax on saturated fat, but only 15 months later the fat tax was abolished. The aim of this article is to investigate the political processes surrounding the implementation and rapid abolition of the fat tax. Our findings suggest that industry and trade associations were heavily involved in the political process of formulating the fat tax. Industry representatives used certain tactics to oppose the fat tax: threatening lawsuits, predicting welfare losses, casting doubt on evidence, diverting focus and requesting postponement. After the fat tax was implemented, the food industry continued their opposition through intensified lobbyism and juridical actions at EU level. However, other factors seem to have contributed to the fall of the fat tax. The tax received criticism for being poorly designed and gradually lost popularity among health professionals, politicians and the public. In the end, the fat tax was abolished for financial reasons. This study demonstrates how politicians considered the fat tax as a funding source rather than a public health initiative, which resulted in significant shortcomings. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the massive influence by industry stakeholders was not balanced with inputs from public health professionals, who should assume a more proactive role in policy-making.

Original languageEnglish
JournalHealth policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Volume119
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)737-42
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Mar 2015

ID: 45266672