Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To validate a revised version of the KIMRISS method for quantification of BML and synovitis-effusion in the knee by comparison with an established method, MOAKS.
METHODS: Novel calibration tools were developed for both methods. We compared reliability for status and change scores of BML and synovitis-effusion on baseline and one-year MRI scans.
RESULTS: Significant increase in both BML and synovitis-effusion was evident using KIMRISS but only for synovitis-effusion using MOAKS. Pre-specified targets for acceptable reliability (≥0.80 and ≥0.70 for status and change scores, respectively) were achieved more frequently for KIMRISS for both BML and synovitis.
CONCLUSION: Per OFISA criteria, KIMRISS should progress to assessment of discrimination.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Pages (from-to) | 925-928 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| ISSN | 0049-0172 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2021 |
Keywords
- Bone marrow lesions
- Knee inflammation MRI scoring system (KIMRISS)
- MRI
- OMERACT
- Osteoarthritis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The OMERACT Knee Inflammation MRI Scoring System: Validation of quantitative methodologies and tri-compartmental overlays in osteoarthritis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS