Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

The Manchester-Fothergill procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched historical cohort study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Surgical treatment of primary uterine prolapse: a comparison of vaginal native tissue surgical techniques

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Comments on Letter to the Editor: prolapse reduction deteriorates the urethral closure mechanism

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

  3. Prolapse reduction deteriorates the urethral closure mechanism

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. A Danish national population-based cohort study of synthetic midurethral slings, 2007-2011

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Alcohol intake in early pregnancy and spontaneous preterm birth: a cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Continuous vs stepwise anal acoustic reflectometry: An improved technique for physiological measurement of anal sphincter function?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Native tissue repair is cost-effective in primary anterior POP

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study compares vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension (VH) with the Manchester-Fothergill procedure (MP) for treating pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in the apical compartment.

METHODS: Our matched historical cohort study is based on data from four Danish databases and the corresponding electronic medical records. Patients with POP surgically treated with VH (n = 295) or the MP (n = 295) in between 2010 and 2014 were matched for age and preoperative POP stage in the apical compartment. The main outcome was recurrent or de novo POP in any compartment. Secondary outcomes were recurrent or de novo POP in each compartment and complications.

RESULTS: The risk of recurrent or de novo POP in any compartment was higher after VH (18.3%) compared with the MP (7.8%) (Hazard ratio, HR = 2.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-4.8). Recurrence in the apical compartment occurred in 5.1% after VH vs. 0.3% after the MP (hazard ratio (HR) = 10.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-78.1). In the anterior compartment, rates of recurrent or de novo POP were 11.2% after VH vs. 4.1% after the MP (HR = 3.5, 95% CI 1.4-8.7) and in the posterior compartment 12.9% vs. 4.7% (HR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.3-5.4), respectively. There were more perioperative complications (2.7 vs. 0%, p = 0.007) and postoperative intra-abdominal bleeding (2 vs. 0%, p = 0.03) after VH.

CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the MP is superior to VH; if there is no other indication for hysterectomy, the MP should be preferred to VH for surgical treatment of POP in the apical compartment.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Urogynecology Journal
Volume29
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)431-440
Number of pages10
ISSN0937-3462
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2018

    Research areas

  • Adult, Aged, Cohort Studies, Databases, Factual, Female, Humans, Hysterectomy, Vaginal/methods, Middle Aged, Organ Sparing Treatments/methods, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Recurrence, Risk Factors, Uterine Prolapse/classification

ID: 56368821