Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

The impact of rate of weight loss on body composition and compensatory mechanisms during weight reduction: A randomized control trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Gastric cancer and gastrin: on the interaction of Helicobacter pylori gastritis and acid inhibitory induced hypergastrinemia

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Investigating the effect of sex and ketosis on weight-loss-induced changes in appetite

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Fructose malabsorption induces cholecystokinin expression in the ileum and cecum by changing microbiota composition and metabolism

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Opinion: Stop gaming peer review

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateCommunication

  • Sílvia Ribeiro Coutinho
  • Emilie With
  • Jens F Rehfeld
  • Bård Kulseng
  • Helen Truby
  • Cátia Martins
View graph of relations

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Rapid weight loss (WL) has been associated with a larger loss of fat free mass and a disproportional reduction in resting metabolic rate (RMR), but the evidence is inconclusive. We aimed to evaluate the impact of WL rate on body composition and compensatory mechanisms activated with WL (reduced RMR, increased exercise efficiency (ExEff) and appetite), both during negative and neutral energy balance (EB).

METHODS: Thirty-five participants with obesity were randomized to lose a similar weight rapidly (4 weeks) or gradually (8 weeks), and afterwards to maintain it (4 weeks). Body weight and composition, RMR, ExEff (10, 25 and 50 W), appetite feelings and appetite-regulating hormones (active ghrelin, cholecystokinin, total peptide YY (PYY), active glucagon-like peptide-1 and insulin), in fasting and every 30 min up to 2.5 h, were measured at baseline and after each phase.

RESULTS: Changes in body weight (≈9%) and composition were similar in both groups. With WL, RMR decreased and ExEff at 10 W increased significantly in the rapid WL group only. However, fasting hunger increased significantly with gradual WL only, while fasting and postprandial prospective food consumption, and postprandial hunger decreased (and postprandial fullness increased) significantly with rapid WL only. Basal total PYY, and basal and postprandial insulin decreased significantly, and similarly in both groups. After weight stabilization and no ketosis no differences between groups were found.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite differences while under negative EB, WL rate does not seem to have a significant impact on body composition or on compensatory mechanisms, once EB is reestablished.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01912742 (the study was registered in clinicaltrial.gov).

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)
Volume37
Pages (from-to)1154-1162
Number of pages13
ISSN0261-5614
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Research areas

  • Journal Article

ID: 52055018