The historical group of withdrawn Cochrane reviews should be distinguished from retracted papers

Original language	English
Journal	Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
Volume	14
Issue number	4
Pages (from-to)	269-271
Number of pages	3
ISSN	1756-5383
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12449
Publication status	Published - Dec 2021

Access to Document

@article{9989ac02cce2445fbb477a5b3ed0c5e8,

title = "The historical group of withdrawn Cochrane reviews should be distinguished from retracted papers",

author = "Buciek, {Jens Hove} and Andersen, {Mikkel Zola} and Siv Fonnes and Kristoffer Andresen and Jacob Rosenberg",

year = "2021",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1111/jebm.12449",

language = "English",

volume = "14",

pages = "269--271",

journal = "Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine",

issn = "1756-5383",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The historical group of withdrawn Cochrane reviews should be distinguished from retracted papers

AU - Buciek, Jens Hove

AU - Andersen, Mikkel Zola

AU - Fonnes, Siv

AU - Andresen, Kristoffer

AU - Rosenberg, Jacob

PY - 2021/12

Y1 - 2021/12

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116851559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jebm.12449

DO - 10.1111/jebm.12449

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34632706

SN - 1756-5383

VL - 14

SP - 269

EP - 271

JO - Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

JF - Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

IS - 4

ER -