TY - JOUR
T1 - The environmental occurrence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
AU - Crone, Stephanie
AU - Vives-Flórez, Martha
AU - Saunders, Aaron M
AU - Kvich, Lasse
AU - Malone, Matthew
AU - Nicolaisen, Mette H
AU - Martínez-García, Esteban
AU - Rojas-Acosta, Catalina
AU - Catalina Gomez-Puerto, Maria
AU - Calum, Henrik
AU - Whiteley, Marvin
AU - Kolter, Roberto
AU - Bjarnsholt, Thomas
N1 - © 2019 APMIS. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2020/3
Y1 - 2020/3
N2 - Pseudomonas aeruginosa is generally described as ubiquitous in natural settings, such as soil and water. However, because anecdotal observations and published reports have questioned whether or not this description is true, we undertook a rigorous study using three methods to investigate the occurrence of P. aeruginosa: we investigated environmental samples, analyzed 16S rRNA data, and undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data. The environmental sample screening identified P. aeruginosa as significantly associated with hydrocarbon and pesticide contaminated environments and feces, as compared to uncontaminated environments in which its prevalence was relatively low. The 16S rRNA data analysis showed that P. aeruginosa sequences were present in all habitats but were most abundant in samples from human and animals. Similarly, the meta-analysis revealed that samples obtained from environments with intense human contact had a higher prevalence of P. aeruginosa compared to those with less human contact. Thus, we found a clear tendency of P. aeruginosa to be present in places closely linked with human activity. Although P. aeruginosa may be ubiquitous in nature, it is usually scarce in pristine environments. Thus, we suggest that P. aeruginosa should be described as a bacterium largely found in locations associated with human activity.
AB - Pseudomonas aeruginosa is generally described as ubiquitous in natural settings, such as soil and water. However, because anecdotal observations and published reports have questioned whether or not this description is true, we undertook a rigorous study using three methods to investigate the occurrence of P. aeruginosa: we investigated environmental samples, analyzed 16S rRNA data, and undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data. The environmental sample screening identified P. aeruginosa as significantly associated with hydrocarbon and pesticide contaminated environments and feces, as compared to uncontaminated environments in which its prevalence was relatively low. The 16S rRNA data analysis showed that P. aeruginosa sequences were present in all habitats but were most abundant in samples from human and animals. Similarly, the meta-analysis revealed that samples obtained from environments with intense human contact had a higher prevalence of P. aeruginosa compared to those with less human contact. Thus, we found a clear tendency of P. aeruginosa to be present in places closely linked with human activity. Although P. aeruginosa may be ubiquitous in nature, it is usually scarce in pristine environments. Thus, we suggest that P. aeruginosa should be described as a bacterium largely found in locations associated with human activity.
KW - Environmental
KW - incidence
KW - occurrence
KW - Pseudomonas aeruginosa
KW - Pseudomonas Infections/microbiology
KW - Animals
KW - Environmental Microbiology
KW - Humans
KW - Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genetics
KW - RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics
KW - Environment
U2 - 10.1111/apm.13010
DO - 10.1111/apm.13010
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 31709616
SN - 0903-4641
VL - 128
SP - 220
EP - 231
JO - APMIS - Journal of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology
JF - APMIS - Journal of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology
IS - 3
ER -