Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

The effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with diabetes and non-ischaemic systolic heart failure

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Temporal relations between atrial fibrillation and ischaemic stroke and their prognostic impact on mortality

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is associated with lower incidence of heart failure and death

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Death with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: a MADIT-II substudy

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Aetiologies and temporal trends of atrioventricular block in young patients: a 20-year nationwide study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Clinical usefulness of FDG-PET/CT for identification of abnormal extra-cardiac foci in patients with infective endocarditis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Incidence of Ischemic Stroke in Individuals With and Without Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Danish Retrospective Cohort Study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Statin therapy is associated with lower prevalence of gut microbiota dysbiosis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

AIMS: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death, but not all-cause death in patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure (HF). Whether co-existence of diabetes affects ICD treatment effects is unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the effect of ICD implantation on risk of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and sudden cardiac death (SCD) according to diabetes status at baseline in the Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients with Non-ischaemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality (DANISH) trial. Outcomes were analysed by use of cumulative incidence curves and Cox regressions models. Of the 1116 patients enrolled, 211 (19%) had diabetes at baseline. Patients with diabetes were more obese, had worse kidney function and more were in New York Heart Association Class III/IV. The risk of device infections and other complications in the ICD group was similar among patients with and without diabetes (6.1% vs. 4.6% P = 0.54). Irrespective of treatment group, diabetes was associated with higher risk of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and SCD. The treatment effect of ICD in patients with diabetes vs. patients without diabetes was hazard ratio (HR) = 0.92 (0.57-1.50) vs. HR = 0.85 (0.63-1.13); Pinteraction = 0.60 for all-cause mortality, HR = 0.99 (0.58-1.70) vs. HR = 0.70 (0.48-1.01); Pinteraction = 0.25 for cardiovascular death, and HR = 0.81 (0.35-1.88) vs. HR = 0.40 (0.22-0.76); Pinteraction = 0.16 for sudden cardiac death.

CONCLUSION: Among patients with non-ischaemic systolic HF, diabetes was associated with higher incidence of all-cause mortality, primarily driven by cardiovascular mortality including SCD. Treatment effect of ICD therapy was not significantly modified by diabetes which might be due to lack of power.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
Volume21
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)1203-1210
Number of pages8
ISSN1099-5129
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

ID: 57661292