Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

The effect of cardiorespiratory fitness assessment in preventive health checks: a randomised controlled trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Large diversity in Danish health literacy profiles: perspectives for care of long-term illness and multimorbidity

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Validation and calibration of self-reported height and weight in the Danish Health Examination Survey

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Transnational exchange of surveillance data reveals previously unrecognized TBEV microfocus

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. How ethnic and racial everyday practices in Denmark affect emotional wellbeing at school

    Research output: Contribution to journalConference abstract in journalResearchpeer-review

  1. Health literacy meets the life-course perspective: towards a conceptual framework

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Large diversity in Danish health literacy profiles: perspectives for care of long-term illness and multimorbidity

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Background: Poor cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) increases morbidity and mortality risks. Routine CRF assessment in clinical practice has thus been advocated, but little is known about the effect. In this study, we investigated the effect of CRF assessment on CRF in a preventive health check programme.

Methods: We used a randomised design, in which we invited 4153 middle-aged adults and included 2201 participants who received a preventive health check with CRF assessment (intervention) or without CRF assessment (control). After 1 year, participants were examined. The primary outcomes were adjusted absolute (l/min), relative (ml/kg/min), and poor (%) CRF assessed by the Astrand-Ryhming test. We adjusted for baseline physical activity and intra-cluster correlation within general practices.

Results: A total of 901 attended the 1-year follow-up. In the intervention group, absolute CRF, relative CRF, and poor CRF were 2.7 l/min (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.6; 2.8), 34.5 ml/kg/min (95% CI: 33.5; 35.4), and 31.0% (95% CI: 26.8; 35.2). In the control group, the corresponding figures were 2.8 l/min (95% CI: 2.7; 2.9), 35.2 ml/kg/min (95% CI: 34.2; 36.1), and 25.9% (95% CI: 21.8; 30.0). Adjusted absolute CRF was lower in the intervention group (-0.1 l/min [95% CI: -0.2; -0.01]). Adjusted relative CRF (-0.7 ml/kg/min [95% CI: -2.0; 0.6]) and poor CRF (5.0% [95% CI: -0.002; 10.1]) did not differ between groups. No differences were found when adjusting for potential confounding factors.

Conclusion: Preventive health checks with CRF assessment did not provide higher CRF levels at 1-year follow-up than preventive health checks without CRF assessment.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Public Health
Volume28
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)173-179
Number of pages6
ISSN1101-1262
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2018

    Research areas

  • Journal Article

ID: 51787074