Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

The diagnostic accuracy of carcinoembryonic antigen to detect colorectal cancer recurrence - A systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Treatment of patients with acute colonic diverticulitis complicated by abscess formation: A systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Incidence of Inguinal Hernia after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Kønsmodificerende kirurgi i Danmark

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Outcome Measures in Gender-Confirming Chest Surgery: A Systematic Scoping Review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

INTRODUCTION: Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) has been used as a tumor marker in the follow-up of colorectal cancer for more than 40 years. Controversy exists regarding its diagnostic applicability due to a relatively low sensitivity and a questionable effect on mortality. The aim of this review was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CEA in detecting recurrence after intended curative surgery for primary colorectal cancer.

METHODS: Systematic literature searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases, and articles were chosen based on predefined inclusion criteria. Reference lists from included articles were manually searched for additional publications of relevance.

RESULTS: Forty-two original studies with generally representative populations and long follow-up were included. Data were reported on outcomes from 9,834 CEA tests during follow-up. Reporting on the reference standards used was not optimal. Sensitivity of CEA ranged from 17.4 % to 100 %, specificity ranged from 66.1 % to 98.4 %, positive predictive value ranged from 45.8 % to 95.2% and negative predictive value ranged from 74.5 % to 100 %.

CONCLUSION: Results point toward a sensitivity of CEA ranging between 50 % and 80 %, and a specificity and negative predictive value above 80 %. Results on positive predictive value showed low reliability. Overall, CEA did not effectively detect treatable recurrences at an early stage, and a clinically relevant effect on patient mortality remains to be proven.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Surgery
Volume25
Pages (from-to)134-144
Number of pages11
ISSN1743-9191
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2016

ID: 45956271