Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

The construct validity of the Perceived Stress Scale

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Longitudinal associations of self-reported satisfaction with life and vitality with risk of mortality

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Detection of illness worry in the general population: A specific item on illness rumination improves the Whiteley Index

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Self-reported health status and the associated risk of mortality in heart failure: The DANISH trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Mental health is a risk factor for poor outcomes in cardiac patients: Findings from the national DenHeart survey

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Marie Germund Nielsen
  • Eva Ørnbøl
  • Mogens Vestergaard
  • Per Bech
  • Finn Breinholt Larsen
  • Mathias Lasgaard
  • Kaj Sparle Christensen
View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: Stress impacts the quality of life and is associated with increased risk of mental and physical disorders. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is widely used for measuring psychological distress. Although the instrument was originally defined as a single construct, several studies based on classical test theory suggest that a two-dimensional structure is more dominant. We aimed to explore the construct validity and dimensionality of the PSS-10 using modern test theory to determine if the scale is predominantly for a one- or a two-dimensional model.

METHODS: The study population consisted of 32,374 citizens who completed the PSS-10 as part of the Danish National Health Survey in 2010. We investigated the construct validity of the PSS-10 by CFA. We examined the scalability by investigating the fit of the data distribution in a unidimensional Rasch model and performing modification of response categories, persons and items. The scale dimensionality was additionally assessed by Mokken and Rasch analysis.

RESULTS: The PSS-10 did not fit the Rasch model. Item four indicated the largest misfit, and items four and seven displayed disordered thresholds. Unidimensionality could not be established although the data showed improved fit to the Rasch model for the two dimensions respectively with the positive and negative items. Mokken analysis revealed fit to the unidimensional model, but disordered thresholds were shown for item four.

CONCLUSION: Our large population-based study indicated scalability problems in the current version of the PSS-10. The conducted analysis overall revealed better statistical fit for a two-dimensional than a unidimensional model.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume84
Pages (from-to)22-30
Number of pages9
ISSN0022-3999
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2016

    Research areas

  • Adult, Aged, Denmark, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Statistical, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Reproducibility of Results, Research Design, Social Perception, Stress, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

ID: 49659911