Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

The association between self-reported health status and adverse events: a comparison among coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. The longitudinal validity of proxy-reported CHU9D

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Development and content validation of a questionnaire measuring patient empowerment in cancer follow-up

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. International validation of the EORTC CAT Core: a new adaptive instrument for measuring core quality of life domains in cancer

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

PURPOSE: While several studies have investigated clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), studies investigating self-reported health and the association with adverse outcomes are limited. Thus, the aim was to investigate differences in health-related quality of life (HRQoL), anxiety and depression at discharge and the association with a composite endpoint of the first event of acute cardiac readmission, revascularisation or 1-year mortality among patients undergoing CABG vs. PCI.

METHODS: Data from the national cohort study, DenHeart, were used, including measures of HRQoL; EuroQoL-5D-5L (EQ-5D Index Score and VAS) and HeartQoL (Global, Physical and Emotional), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS) and register-based follow-up. A total of 7000 patients were included (CABG n = 652, PCI n = 6348) (median age 65, 75% men). Cox Proportional Hazard models were performed among a propensity-matched population of responders (n = 520).

RESULTS: HRQoL was significantly better among patients undergoing PCI vs. CABG, but with no differences in time to readmission or revascularisation. HRQoL, anxiety and depression were significantly associated with the risk of the composite endpoint among the PCI group (Hazard Ratio, HR (95% confidence intervals, CI) [EQ-5D index score 3.07 (1.67-5.67), EQ-5D VAS 0.97 (0.96-0.99), HeartQol Global 0.61 (0.38-0.95), HeartQol Emotional 0.56 (0.39-0.80), HADS-D ≥ 8 3.12 (1.61-6.01), HADS-A ≥ 8 2.08 (1.14-3.80)].

CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing PCI reported better HRQoL at discharge compared with patients undergoing CABG, whereas readmission rates were similar. Self-reported health was associated with the risk of adverse events among patients undergoing PCI, but not among patients undergoing CABG.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01926145.

Original languageEnglish
JournalQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation
Volume29
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)3017-3029
Number of pages13
ISSN0962-9343
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2020

    Research areas

  • Aged, Cohort Studies, Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/diagnosis, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects, Quality of Life/psychology, Self Report/standards, Treatment Outcome

ID: 62110635