Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

The Association Between Self-Rated Fitness and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Adults

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Maximal Fat Oxidation is Related to Performance in an Ironman Triathlon

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Urine and serum concentrations of inhaled and oral terbutaline

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Urine concentrations of repetitive doses of inhaled salbutamol

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Screening for autologous blood transfusions

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Evaluation of Serum Insulin-like Factor 3 Quantification by LC-MS/MS as a Biomarker of Leydig Cell Function

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Temporal relations between atrial fibrillation and ischaemic stroke and their prognostic impact on mortality

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

To assess criterion validity of a single item question on self-rated physical fitness against objectively measured cardiorespiratory fitness. From the Health2008 study 749 men and women between 30 and 60 years of age rated their fitness as excellent, very good, good, fair or poor. Cardiorespiratory fitness was estimated with the watt-max test. Agreement between self-rated and objectively measured physical fitness was assessed by Cohen's weighted kappa coefficient. Correlation was determined by Goodman & Kruskal's gamma correlation coefficient. All analyses were stratified according to gender. Data from 323 men and 426 women were analysed. There was a slight agreement between self-rated and objectively measured fitness in men (weighted kappa: 0.18, [95%CI: 0.13;0.23]) and a fair agreement in women (weighted kappa: 0.27, [95%CI: 0.22;0.32]). In both genders, self-rated fitness was positively correlated with objectively measured fitness (moderate correlation; gamma correlation coefficient for men: 0.63 [95%CI: 0.54;0.72] and women: 0.67 [95%CI: 0.59;0.75]). There was a slight to fair agreement and moderate, positive correlations between self-rated physical fitness and watt-max estimated cardiorespiratory fitness. Hence, a single-item question on physical fitness may be a cost-effective method of assessing fitness in large population studies, but is not valid for individual assessments.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume39
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)419-425
ISSN0172-4622
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Research areas

  • Journal Article

ID: 53659019