Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

The association between epidural analgesia and mortality in emergency abdominal surgery: A population-based cohort study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Impact of Physician-staffed Helicopters on Pre-hospital Patient Outcomes: a systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. Hypothermic to ischemic ratio and mortality in post-cardiac arrest patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Response letter to comments made by J. G. Förster, M. Pitkänen

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

  1. Heterogeneity of treatment effect of prophylactic pantoprazole in adult ICU patients: a post hoc analysis of the SUP-ICU trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. APACHE II score validation in emergency abdominal surgery. A post hoc analysis of the InCare trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Effects of magnesium, phosphate and zinc supplementation in ICU patients-Protocol for a systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  • Danish Anaesthesia Database
View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Emergency abdominal surgery carries a considerable risk of mortality and postoperative complications, including pulmonary complications. In major elective surgery, epidural analgesia reduces mortality and pulmonary complications. We aimed to evaluate the association between epidural analgesia and mortality in emergency abdominal surgery.

METHODS: In this population-based cohort study with prospective data collection, we included adults undergoing emergency abdominal laparotomy or laparoscopy between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2010 at 13 Danish hospitals. Appendectomies were excluded. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and serious adverse events. We used binary logistic regression analyses (odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)).

RESULTS: We included 4 920 patients, of which 1 134 (23.0%) died within 90 days. Overall, 27.9% of the patients were treated with epidural analgesia perioperatively. This increased to 34.0% among patients undergoing major laparotomy. The crude and adjusted association between epidural analgesia and 90-day mortality was OR 0.99 (95%CI: 0.86-1.15, P=0.94) and OR 0.80 (95%CI: 0.67-0.94; P= 0.01), respectively. For 30-day mortality the corresponding estimates were OR 0.90 (95%CI: 0.76-1.06, P=0.21) and OR 0.75 (95%CI: 0.62-0.90, P<0.01), respectively. No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION: In this population-based cohort study of adult patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery, we found that the use of epidural analgesia perioperatively was associated with a decreased risk of mortality in the adjusted analysis.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Volume64
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)104-111
Number of pages8
ISSN0001-5172
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Bibliographical note

© 2019 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

ID: 57846345