Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

The 2018 Revision to the Process of Care Model for Evaluation of Erectile Dysfunction

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Female Orgasm and Overall Sexual Function and Habits: A Descriptive Study of a Cohort of U.S. Women

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Contemporary Thoughts on the Role of Shockwave Therapy in Peyronie's Disease

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

  3. YouTube as a Source of Information About Premature Ejaculation Treatment

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Hyperseksualitet

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleCommunication

  2. Sexual Health and Dysfunction in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cross-sectional Single-Center Study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • John P Mulhall
  • Annamaria Giraldi
  • Geoff Hackett
  • Wayne J G Hellstrom
  • Emmanuele A Jannini
  • Eusebio Rubio-Aurioles
  • Landon Trost
  • Tarek A Hassan
View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common condition that may affect men of all ages; in 1999, a Process of Care Model was developed to provide clinicians with recommendations regarding the evaluation and management of ED.

AIM: To reflect the evolution of the study of ED since 1999, this update to the process of care model presents health care providers with a tool kit to facilitate patient interactions, comprehensive evaluation, and counseling for ED.

METHODS: A cross-disciplinary panel of international experts met to propose updates to the 1999 process of care model from a global perspective. The updated model was designed to be evidence-based, data-driven, and accessible to a wide range of health care providers.

OUTCOMES: This article summarizes the resulting discussion of the expert meeting and focuses on ED evaluation. The management of ED is discussed in an article by Muhall et al (J Sex Med 2018;15:XXX-XXX).

RESULTS: A comprehensive approach to the evaluation of ED is warranted because ED may involve both psychological and organic components. The updated process of care model for evaluation was divided into core and optional components and now focuses on the combination of first-line pharmacotherapy and counseling in consideration of patient sexual dynamics.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patient evaluation for ED should encompass a variety of aspects, including medical history, sexual history, physical examination, psychological evaluation, laboratory testing, and possibly adjunctive testing.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This update draws on author expertise and experience to provide multi-faceted guidance for the evaluation of ED in a modern context. Although a limited number of contributors provided input on the update, these experts represent diverse fields that encounter patients with ED. Additionally, no meta-analyses were performed to further support the ED evaluation guidelines presented.

CONCLUSION: Comprehensive evaluation of ED affords health care providers an opportunity to address medical, psychological/psycho-social, and sexual issues associated with ED, with the ultimate goal being effective management and possibly resolution of ED. While some or all techniques described in the updated model may be needed for each patient, evaluation should in all cases be thorough. Mulhall JP, Giraldi A, Hackett G, et al. The 2018 Revision to the Process of Care Model for Evaluation of Erectile Dysfunction. J Sex Med 2018;XX:XXX-XXX.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe journal of sexual medicine
VolumeVol. 15
Issue numberIssue 9
Pages (from-to)p1280–1292
Number of pages13
ISSN1743-6095
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Jul 2018

ID: 54921802