Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Temporal trends in population characteristics and type of device among primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients: The DAI-PP programme

  • Diana My Frodi
  • , Serge Boveda
  • , Victor Fournier
  • , Fawzi Kerkouri
  • , Frederic Anselme
  • , Jean-Claude Deharo
  • , Fabrice Extramiana
  • , Laurent Fauchier
  • , Estelle Gandjbakhch
  • , Daniel Gras
  • , Alexis Hermida
  • , Laurence Jesel-Morel
  • , Christophe Leclercq
  • , Nicolas Lellouche
  • , Aymeric Menet
  • , Kumar Narayanan
  • , Olivier Piot
  • , Vincent Probst
  • , Nicolas Sadoul
  • , Jerome Taieb
  • Pascal Defaye, Eloi Marijon, Rodrigue Garcia*, behalf of the DAI-PP investigators
*Corresponding author for this work
2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient characteristics, technology and clinical practice surrounding primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators have evolved continuously over time.

AIM: To explore the temporal changes in patient characteristics, pharmacological therapy and device types among implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients implanted for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death over the last two decades in France.

METHODS: Characteristics of participants and type of device from the retrospective DAI-PP Pilot Study (2002-2012) were compared with those from the ongoing prospective DAI-PP Consortium (2018 onwards).

RESULTS: This study included 9588 participants overall (DAI-PP Pilot Study, n=5539; DAI-PP Consortium, n=4049). Compared with the DAI-PP Pilot Study, the DAI-PP Consortium subjects were older at implantation (62.5 vs 65.2 years; P=0.001) and had a higher proportion of women (15.1% vs 20.6%; P<0.001), a similar proportion of ischaemic heart disease (60.2% vs 60.2%; P=0.98), a higher left ventricular ejection fraction (27±7% vs 30±8%; P<0.001) and more patients with narrow QRS complexes (30.5% vs 46.0%; P<0.001). The proportion of patients treated with heart failure drugs increased significantly (70.1% vs 83.1%; P<0.001), whereas the use of amiodarone became much less frequent (22.7% vs 14.7%; P<0.001). Finally, the proportions of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (53.8% vs 46.4%; P<0.001) and dual-chamber defibrillators (23.3% vs 17.3%; P<0.001) decreased, whereas subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators now account for a sizeable proportion of implants (14.6%).

CONCLUSIONS: Over a 20-year period, the primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator population has evolved significantly, with an older age and a higher proportion of women. The type of device has changed, with fewer cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators and more subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Original languageEnglish
JournalArchives of cardiovascular diseases
Volume118
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)178-184
Number of pages7
ISSN1875-2128
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2025

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy
  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices/trends
  • Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control
  • Defibrillators, Implantable
  • Electric Countershock/instrumentation
  • Female
  • France/epidemiology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pilot Projects
  • Primary Prevention/instrumentation
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Implantable cardioverter defibrillator
  • Temporal trends
  • Sudden cardiac death
  • Baseline characteristics
  • Primary prevention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Temporal trends in population characteristics and type of device among primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients: The DAI-PP programme'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this