Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Temporal trends in incidence and patient characteristics in cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction from 2010 to 2017: a Danish cohort study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Risk of heart failure in type 2 diabetes complicated by incident ischaemic heart disease and end-stage renal disease

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Mechanical respiratory support in cardiogenic shock: reply

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

  1. Association between transfusion of blood products and acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Cognitive impairment and psychopathology in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors in Denmark: The REVIVAL cohort study protocol

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump for Cardiogenic Shock

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis for acute intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

AIM: We sought to describe the contemporary annual incidence of cardiogenic shock (CS) following acute myocardial infarction (AMICS), the proportion of patients developing CS following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and other temporal changes in AMICS in Denmark between 2010 and 2017.

METHODS AND RESULTS: Medical records of patients suspected of having AMICS during 2010-2017 were reviewed to identify consecutive patients with AMICS in a cohort corresponding to two-thirds of the Danish population. Due to changes in recruitment area over the study period, population-based incidence could only be calculated from 2012 to 2017. A total of 1716 patients with AMICS were identified and an increase in the annual incidence was observed, from a nadir 65.3 per million person-years in 2013 to 80.0 per million person-years in 2017 (P-value for trend < 0.001). This trend corresponded to an increase in patients with non-STEMI and a decrease in patients developing CS after STEMI (10.0-6.6%, P-value for trend < 0.001) Also, mean arterial blood pressure at the time of AMICS was lower (63 ± 11 mmHg to 61 ± 13 mmHg, P-value for trend = 0.001) and the frequency of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 30% increased (61.8%-71.4%, P-value for trend = 0.004). The annual 30-day mortality during the study period remained unchanged at about 50%.

CONCLUSION: The incidence rate of AMICS increased in the Danish population between 2012 and 2017. Fewer patients with STEMI developed CS, and haemodynamic severity of CS increased during the study period; however, survival rates remained unchanged.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Heart Failure
Volume21
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)1370-1378
ISSN1388-9842
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Research areas

  • Cardiogenic shock, Epidemiology, Mechanical circulatory support, Myocardial infarction, Percutaneous coronary intervention

ID: 58042351