Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital

Telemetric continuous glucose monitoring during the COVID-19 pandemic in isolated hospitalized patients in Denmark - a randomized controlled exploratory trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review


  1. Sustained Pro-Inflammatory Effects of Hypoglycemia in People with Type 2 Diabetes and in People Without Diabetes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Endotheliopathy is associated with slower liberation from mechanical ventilation: a cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Objective: To investigate whether telemetric continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in hospitalized and isolated patients with diabetes mellitus and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with better glycemic outcomes and fewer patient health care worker contacts compared to blood glucose monitoring by traditional point-of-care (POC) glucose testing and to investigate the user aspect of implementing a CGM-system in-hospital. Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled exploratory trial was performed on hospitalized and isolated patients with diabetes and COVID-19 from May 2020 until February 2021 at Nordsjællands Hospital, Denmark. Participants were randomized to nonblinded telemetric CGM (as the only glucose monitoring method) or traditional POC glucose testing + blinded CGM. The primary endpoint was time in range (TIR) based on CGM data in both groups. A questionnaire about the user aspect of the CGM system was answered by health care personnel (HCP). Results: We included 64 participants in the analysis, 31 in the CGM group and 33 in the POC glucose group. TIR median was 46% for the CGM group and 68% for the POC glucose group (P = 0.368). The mean glucose value for the CGM group was 11.1 and 10.8 mmol/L in the POC glucose group (P = 0.372). CGM was associated with fewer POC glucose measurements (P < 0.001). Out of 30 HCPs, 28 preferred telemetric CGM over POC glucose testing. Conclusion: Remote glucose monitoring by CGM did not improve glycemic outcomes compared to traditional POC glucose testing, but was associated with fewer patient-personnel contacts, saving time for HCPs performing diabetes-related tasks. Most HCPs preferred CGM. The study is registered at (#NCT04430608).

Original languageEnglish
JournalDiabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)102-112
Number of pages11
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2022

ID: 67614936