Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Systematic review of the QoR-15 score, a patient- reported outcome measure measuring quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Minimising droplet and virus spread during and after tracheal extubation

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

  2. Enhanced recovery after surgery components and perioperative outcomes: a nationwide observational study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of postdural puncture headache: a randomised, blinded, clinical trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Use of the GRADE approach in systematic reviews and guidelines

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

  1. Associations between blood cultures after surgery for colorectal cancer and long-term oncological outcomes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Validity of the diagnosis of appendicitis in the Danish National Patient Register

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Quality of recovery after major emergency abdominal surgery. A prospective observational cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. The clinical implication of the association between hypoxaemia and postoperative troponin I: a reply

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: The QoR-15 is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire that measures the quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the measurement properties of the QoR-15.

METHODS: Studies reporting measurement properties or interpretability of the QoR-15 after surgery were eligible for inclusion. All languages were included in the PubMed and Embase search. The COSMIN guidelines for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measurements were followed. Criteria for good measurement properties outlined in the consensus-based guidelines for selecting outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials were applied. A metaanalysis and synthesis of data across studies was performed.

RESULTS: Nine hundred and thirty-three titles were identified, and six articles were included in the study. The study population comprised 1548 patients undergoing a variety of surgical elective procedures. The QoR-15 was validated in English, Danish, Chinese, and Portuguese. High-quality evidence for good content validity, good internal consistency (Cronbach's α of 0.836), and essential unidimensionality of the QoR-15 as a measurement of postoperative quality of recovery was found. There was at least moderate-quality evidence of good reliability of the QoR-15 (intraclass correlation of 0.989) and good error of measurement (standard error of measurement of 1.85). The upper 95% confidence limit of the smallest detectable change was 3.63, and the minimal clinical important difference was 8.0.

CONCLUSIONS: The QoR-15 fulfils requirements for outcome measurement instruments in clinical trials and is the first measurement instrument of postoperative quality of recovery to undergo a systematic review according to the COSMIN checklist.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume120
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)28-36
ISSN0007-0912
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Research areas

  • Journal Article, Review

ID: 53743405