Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Long-term Reintervention Following Thoracic Endovascular Repair for Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injury

Stefano Gennai, Nicola Leone*, Luca Mezzetto, Gian Franco Veraldi, Daniele Santi, Giorgia Spaggiari, Timothy Resch, Roberto Silingardi

*Corresponding author for this work
22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term reinterventions of thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) after blunt traumatic aortic injury.

METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were interrogated until June 2021. Inclusion criteria were blunt traumatic aortic injury treated with TEVAR and mean follow-up of more than 60 months. A systematic review was conducted and data were pooled using a random effects model of proportions applying the Freeman-Tukey transformation. Late reintervention was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were procedure-related complications (endoleak, in-stent thrombosis, occlusion, infolding/collapse, bird-beak, migration, and left arm claudication), overall and aortic-related mortality, and aortic diameter changes.

RESULTS: Eleven studies with a low quality assessment were included. Four hundred eight patients were collected and the 389 surviving more than 30 days were included. The mean follow-up was 8.2 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7-10.8; I2 = 40.2%). Late reintervention was 2.1% (95% CI, 0.6-3.9; I2 = 0.0%; 11/389 cases) with 0.1% (95% CI, 0.0-1.2; I2 = 0.0%; 3/389) occurring after 5 years. Bird-beak was identified in 38.7% (95% CI, 16.4-63.6; I2 = 86.6%). Left arm claudication occurring after 30 days was 3.1% (95% CI, 0.1-8.6; I2 = 26.9%; 11/140 cases). In-stent thrombosis was 1.9% (95% CI, 0.1-5.2; I2 = 51.8%; 11/389 cases). Endoleak was 0.5% (95% CI, 0.0-1.9; I2 = 0.0%; 5/389 cases). Infolding, occlusion, and migration were reported in 2 of 389, 1 of 389, and 0 of 389 patients, respectively. Overall late survival was 95.6% (95% CI, 88.1-99.8; I2 = 84.7%; 358/389 patients) and only one patient accounted for aortic related mortality. The increase in proximal and distal aortic diameters was estimated at 2.7 mm (95% CI, 1.2-4.3; I2 = 0.0%) and 2.5 mm (95% CI, 1.1-3.9; I2 = 0.0%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: TEVAR demonstrates remarkably good long-term results and reinterventions are rarely required. Aortic reinterventions tend to occur within the first and after the fifth year.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
Volume78
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)540-547.e4
ISSN0741-5214
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2023

Keywords

  • Aorta, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis/adverse effects
  • Endoleak/etiology
  • Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stents/adverse effects
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging
  • Reintervention
  • Endovascular technique
  • Meta-analysis
  • Thoracic aorta
  • Systematic reviews
  • Blunt injury

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Long-term Reintervention Following Thoracic Endovascular Repair for Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injury'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this