Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Sympathetic Vasoconstrictor Responsiveness of the Leg Vasculature During Experimental Endotoxemia and Hypoxia in Humans

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Clinical Examination for the Prediction of Mortality in the Critically Ill: The Simple Intensive Care Studies-I

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Luxury Perfusion in Patients With Sepsis?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Validation and Clinical Evaluation of a Method for Double-Blinded Blood Pressure Target Investigation in Intensive Care Medicine

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: Sympathetic vasoconstriction regulates peripheral circulation and controls blood pressure, but sepsis is associated with hypotension. We evaluated whether apparent loss of sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness relates to distended smooth muscles or to endotoxemia and/or hypoxia.

DESIGN: Prospective descriptive study.

SETTING: Hospital research laboratory.

SUBJECTS: Ten healthy young men (age [mean ± SD], 31 ± 8 yr; body weight, 83 ± 10 kg) participated in the study.

INTERVENTIONS: Leg blood flow and mean arterial pressure were determined, whereas leg vascular conductance was calculated during 1) adenosine infusion (vasodilator control), 2) hypoxia (FIO2 = 10%), 3) endotoxemia, and 4) endotoxemia + hypoxia. Leg sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness (reduction in leg vascular conductance) was evaluated by femoral artery tyramine infusion.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Endotoxemia increased body temperature from 36.9 ± 0.4°C to 38.6 ± 0.5°C (p < 0.01) and plasma tumor necrosis factor-α from 6 pg/mL (3-8 pg/mL) to 391 pg/mL (128-2258 pg/mL) (p < 0.01; median [range]). Mean arterial pressure decreased similarly during endotoxemia (-11% ± 16%) and endotoxemia + hypoxia (-10% ± 15%; both p < 0.05). Leg blood flow and leg vascular conductance were not affected by endotoxemia, whereas both were elevated by adenosine infusion (leg blood flow, +94% ± 61%; leg vascular conductance, +97% ± 57%), hypoxia (leg blood flow: +93% ± 58%; leg vascular conductance, +100% ± 115%), and endotoxemia + hypoxia (leg blood flow, +67% ± 120%; leg vascular conductance, +65% ± 57%; p < 0.05). Endotoxemia lessened the tyramine-induced reduction in leg vascular conductance (-28% ± 13%) compared with the reduction during adenosine infusion (-47% ± 5%; p < 0.05). Also, endotoxemia + hypoxia (-17% ± 21%) attenuated the tyramine-induced reduction in leg vascular conductance compared with both adenosine infusion and hypoxia (-45% ± 13%; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: Both endotoxemia and combined hypoxia and endotoxemia blunted sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness. Furthermore, tyramine normalized the doubled leg vascular conductance during administration of adenosine, suggesting that distension of vascular smooth muscles does not explain blunted sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness during endotoxemia.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCritical Care Medicine
Volume44
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)755-63
ISSN0090-3493
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

ID: 45885119