Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Survival Prediction in Patients Treated Surgically for Metastases of the Appendicular Skeleton-An External Validation of 2013-SPRING Model

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Palliative Treatment of Esophageal Cancer Using Calcium Electroporation

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Development and Validation of a Risk Score for Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Bone Disease in the Appendicular Skeleton: A Population-Based Study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Neuronal Sprouting and Reorganization in Bone Tissue Infiltrated by Human Breast Cancer Cells

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Clinical outcome after surgery on schwannomas in the extremities

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Maria Anna Smolle
  • Ewald Musser
  • Marko Bergovec
  • Joerg Friesenbichler
  • Christine Linda Wibmer
  • Lukas Leitner
  • Michala Skovlund Sørensen
  • Michael Mørk Petersen
  • Iva Brcic
  • Joanna Szkandera
  • Susanne Scheipl
  • Andreas Leithner
View graph of relations

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to externally validate the 2013-SPRING model, a survival prediction tool for patients treated surgically for bone metastases in a retrospective patient cohort from a single institution. Moreover, subgroup analyses on patients treated with (A) endoprostheses or (B) osteosynthesis, as well as (C) upper limb and (D) lower limb metastases, were performed.

METHODS: Altogether, 303 cancer patients (mean age: 67.6 ± 11.1 years; 140 males (46.2%)) with bone metastases to the extremities, treated surgically between March 2000 and June 2018 at a single tertiary sarcoma centre, were retrospectively included. Median follow-up amounted to 6.3 (interquartile range (IQR): 2.3-21.8) months, with all patients followed-up for at least one year or until death. The 2013-SPRING model was applied to assess the prognostication accuracy at 3, 6 and 12 months. Models were validated with area under the curve receiver operator characteristic (AUC ROC; the higher the better), as well as Brier score.

RESULTS: Of the 303 patients, 141 had been treated with osteosynthesis (46.5%), and the remaining 162 patients with endoprosthesis (53.5%). Sixty-five (21.5%) metastases were located in the upper limbs, and two hundred and thirty-eight (78.5%) in the lower limbs. Using the 2013-SPRING model for the entire cohort, the accuracy of risk of death prediction at 3, 6 and 12 months, determined by the AUC ROC, was 0.782 (95% CI: 0.729-0.843), 0.810 (95% CI: 0.763-0.858) and 0.802 (95% CI: 0.751-0.854), respectively. Corresponding Brier scores were 0.170, 0.178 and 0.169 at 3, 6 and 12 months. In the subgroup analyses, predictive accuracy of the 2013-SPRING model was likewise encouraging, albeit being slightly higher in the osteosynthesis subgroup as compared with the endoprosthesis subgroup, and also higher in the upper limb in comparison to the lower limb metastasis subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS: The current validation study of the 2013-SPRING model shows that this model is clinically relevant to use in an external cohort, also after stratification for surgical procedure and metastasis location.

Original languageEnglish
Article number3521
JournalCancers
Volume14
Issue number14
ISSN2072-6694
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jul 2022

ID: 79763793