Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Bone Disease in the Appendicular Skeleton: A Population-Based Study

Thea Hovgaard Ladegaard*, Celine Lykke Sørensen, Rasmus Nielsen, Anders Troelsen, Dhergam Ahmed Ali Al-Mousawi, Rikke Bielefeldt, Michael Mørk Petersen, Michala Skovlund Sørensen

*Corresponding author for this work
2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Population-based studies of patients with bone metastases in the appendicular skeleton (aBM) requiring surgery for complete or impending fracture are rare. In this epidemiologically-based observational study we created a large population-based cohort of patients treated for aBM, aiming to: (1) monitor possible time-related changes of the incidence of surgical treatment of aBM-lesions, (2) examine differences in the population and care of patients treated at different treatment centers and (3) examine if findings from a previous pilot study regarding absence of a suitable biopsy of the lesions representing debut of cancer or a relapse has improved the awareness of aBM and hereby increased the focus on regular tumor biopsies and follow-up imaging of cancer patients. Methods: We examined a population-based cohort consisting of all patients treated for aBM 2014–2019. Procedures were performed at five secondary surgical centers (SSC) or one tertiary referral Musculoskeletal Tumor Center (MTC). Patients were followed until end of study (30 September 2021) or death. No patients were lost to follow-up. Results: Four-hundred-fifty-seven patients (493 primary aBM-lesions, 482 procedures) were included. Annual incidence of aBM-surgery was 46 aBM-lesions/million. MTC-patients had a significant better preoperative status than SSC-patients considering factors known for survival. Patients with complete fracture experienced longer surgical delay when treated at MTC compared to SSC: 4 (1–9) and 1 (1–3) days (p < 0.001), respectively. Overall survival for the entire cohort was 37% and 11% at 1 and 5 years (MTC and SSC 1 and 5 year respectively: 44% and 15% vs. 29% and 5%, p < 0.001). In patients with debut or relapse of cancer, 8% and 9% had insufficient biopsies, and 21% and 12% had no biopsy, respectively. Comparison showed no change over time. Conclusions: The current study highlights the low awareness on treating aBM at SSC and emphasizes the importance of caution in interpretation of studies not representing an entire population, thus introducing selection bias.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1258
JournalCancers
Volume14
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
ISSN2072-6694
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Feb 2022

Keywords

  • Appendicular skeleton
  • Biopsy
  • Cancer
  • Extremities
  • Metastatic bone disease
  • Population-based
  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Bone Disease in the Appendicular Skeleton: A Population-Based Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this