Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Subtraction CT angiography improves evaluation of significant coronary artery disease in patients with severe calcifications or stents-the C-Sub 320 multicenter trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Automatically computed rating scales from MRI for patients with cognitive disorders

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Prostate artery embolisation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  3. Observer variability for Lung-RADS categorisation of lung cancer screening CTs: impact on patient management

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Simulator training improves ultrasound scanning performance on patients: a randomized controlled trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Prevalence and risk factors of prolonged QT interval and electrocardiographic abnormalities in persons living with HIV

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Coronary plaque composition assessed by cardiac computed tomography using adaptive Hounsfield unit thresholds

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVES: Diagnostic accuracy of conventional coronary CT angiography (CCTAconv) may be compromised by blooming artifacts from calcifications or stents. Blooming artifacts may be reduced by subtraction coronary CT angiography (CCTAsub) in which non-contrast and contrast CT data sets are subtracted digitally. We tested whether CCTAsub in patients with severe coronary calcification or stents reduces the number of false-positive stenosis evaluations compared with CCTAconv.

METHODS: In this study, 180 symptomatic patients scheduled for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) were prospectively enrolled and CT scanned (2013-2016) at three international centers. CCTAconv, and CCTAsub data sets were reconstructed. Target segments were defined as motion-free coronary segments with a suspected stenosis (> 50% of lumen) potentially due to blooming of either calcium or stents. Target segments were evaluated with respect to misregistration artifacts from the CCTAsub reconstruction process, in which case evaluation was omitted. CCTAsub and CCTAconv were compared with ICA. Primary outcome measure was the frequency of false positives by CCTAconv versus CCTAsub to identify > 50% coronary stenosis by ICA on a per-segment level.

RESULTS: After exclusion of 76 patients, 104 (14% females) with mean age 67 years and median Agatston score 852 were included. There were 136 target segments with misregistration and 121 target segments without. Accuracy calculations in target segments without misregistration showed a reduction of the false positives from 72% [95% confidence interval (CI): 63-80%] in CCTAconv to 33% (CI:25-42%) in CCTAsub, at the expense of 7% (CI:3-14%) false negatives in CCTAsub.

CONCLUSIONS: In severely calcified coronary arteries or stents, CCTAsub reduces the false-positive rate in well-aligned, calcified or stent segments suspected of significant stenosis on CCTAconv. Nevertheless, misregistration artifacts are frequent in CCTAsub.

KEY POINTS: • A high calcium-score reduces the diagnostic accuracy in patients scanned with cardiac CT. • These patients would normally need an invasive angiogram for diagnosis. • In this prospective, multicenter study, subtraction CT, when evaluable, reduces false-positive stenosis evaluations. • Subtraction coronary CT angiography may, when evaluable, reduce excessive downstream testing.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Radiology
Volume28
Issue number10
Pages (from-to)4077-4085
Number of pages9
ISSN0938-7994
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018

    Research areas

  • Aged, Artifacts, Calcinosis/diagnostic imaging, Computed Tomography Angiography/methods, Coronary Angiography/methods, Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging, False Positive Reactions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Stents

ID: 56141642