Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Study of Antithrombotic Treatment After Intracerebral Haemorrhage-Antiplatelets: A Randomized Trial

  • Helle Eilertsen
  • , Kristin Tveitan Larsen
  • , Elisabeth Forfang
  • , Johanna Pennlert
  • , Eva-Lotta Glader
  • , Christina Kruuse
  • , Per Wester
  • , Hege Ihle-Hansen
  • , Maria Carlsson
  • , Trine Lied-Herland
  • , Jūratė Šaltytė Benth
  • , Håkon Ihle-Hansen
  • , Yngve Seljeseth
  • , Marie Norsker Folke
  • , Rustam Al-Shahi Salman
  • , Torgeir Bruun Wyller
  • , Ole Morten Ronning
  • , Else Charlotte Sandset
  • , all STATICH Investigators

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients surviving spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) who have indications for antithrombotic treatment face increased risks of both hemorrhagic and ischemic events. The aim of STATICH (Study of Antithrombotic Treatment After Intracerebral Haemorrhage) was to assess the safety and efficacy of long-term antithrombotic treatment after ICH.

METHODS: STATICH Antiplatelets (EudraCT 2014-002636-13; Unique identifier: NCT03186729) was a randomized, multicenter, open, blinded end point parallel-group trial, including adults with an indication for antiplatelet treatment to either start or avoid antiplatelet treatment. The target sample size was 500 participants. Patients were allocated 1:1 by a Web-based randomization system and followed for a minimum of 2 years. Outcome assessments were done by personnel blinded to treatment. Participants were not blinded. The primary safety outcome was recurrent symptomatic ICH.

RESULTS: The trial was stopped early due to slow recruitment. Sixty-nine patients were included between August 2018 and December 2022: 34 were randomized to start antiplatelet treatment, and 35 were randomized to avoid antiplatelet treatment. No patients were excluded from analyses. The median age was 75 (Q1-Q3, 66-80) years, and 43 (75%) had previous ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Five patients in the start antiplatelet treatment group (15% [95% CI, 6%-31%]), and 1 in the avoid group (3% [95% CI, 0%-18%]) experienced recurrent ICH, while 3 (9% [95% CI, 3%-24%]) and 7 (20% [95% CI, 10%-37%]), respectively, experienced a major ischemic event. A total of 88 serious adverse events and no suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions were registered.

CONCLUSIONS: There were numerically more recurrent ICHs and fewer ischemic events in patients starting antiplatelet treatment after ICH compared with those avoiding antiplatelet treatment. The slow recruitment might be due to clinicians being certain of the best treatment strategy or patients being too frail to participate. STATICH will contribute to a planned collaborative individual patient-data meta-analysis to resolve this dilemma.

Original languageEnglish
JournalStroke
Volume57
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)2287-2294
Number of pages8
ISSN0039-2499
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2026

Keywords

  • cerebral hemorrhage
  • ischemic stroke
  • platelet aggregation inhibitors
  • randomized controlled trial
  • secondary prevention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Study of Antithrombotic Treatment After Intracerebral Haemorrhage-Antiplatelets: A Randomized Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this