Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Stem cell mobilization induced by subcutaneous granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to improve cardiac regeneration after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: result of the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled stem cells in myocardial infarction (STEMMI) trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Effect of liraglutide on expression of inflammatory genes in type 2 diabetes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Ceramides and phospholipids are downregulated with liraglutide treatment: results from the LiraFlame randomized controlled trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Effect of Liraglutide on Vascular Inflammation Evaluated by [64Cu]DOTATATE

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations
BACKGROUND: Phase 1 clinical trials of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) treatment after myocardial infarction have indicated that G-CSF treatment is safe and may improve left ventricular function. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial aimed to assess the efficacy of subcutaneous G-CSF injections on left ventricular function in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (62 men; average age, 56 years) with ST-elevation myocardial infarction were included after successful primary percutaneous coronary stent intervention <12 hours after symptom onset. Patients were randomized to double-blind treatment with G-CSF (10 microg/kg of body weight) or placebo for 6 days. The primary end point was change in systolic wall thickening from baseline to 6 months determined by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). An independent core laboratory analyzed all MRI examinations. Systolic wall thickening improved 17% in the infarct area in the G-CSF group and 17% in the placebo group (P=1.0). Comparable results were found in infarct border and noninfarcted myocardium. Left ventricular ejection fraction improved similarly in the 2 groups measured by both MRI (8.5 versus 8.0; P=0.9) and echocardiography (5.7 versus 3.7; P=0.7). The risk of severe clinical adverse events was not increased by G-CSF. In addition, in-stent late lumen loss and target vessel revascularization rate in the follow-up period were similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bone marrow stem cell mobilization with subcutaneous G-CSF is safe but did not lead to further improvement in ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction compared with the recovery observed in the placebo group
Original languageEnglish
JournalCirculation (Baltimore)
Volume113
Issue number16
Pages (from-to)1983-92
ISSN0009-7322
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

    Research areas

  • Bone Marrow; Clinical Trials; echocardiography; He

ID: 32516054