Abstract
Biomedical science is rapidly developing in terms of more transparency, openness and reproducibility of scientific publications. This is even more important for all studies that are based on results from basic semen examination. Recently two concordant documents have been published: the 6th edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, and the International Standard ISO 23162:2021. With these tools, we propose that authors should be instructed to follow these laboratory methods in order to publish studies in peer-reviewed journals, preferable by using a checklist as suggested in an Appendix to this article.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Human reproduction (Oxford, England) |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| Pages (from-to) | 2497-2502 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| ISSN | 0268-1161 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 31 Oct 2022 |
Keywords
- Humans
- Peer Review
- Publishing
- Reproducibility of Results
- Semen
- Semen Analysis/methods
- quality control
- reproducibility
- standardized laboratory procedures
- science development
- basic semen examination
- patient security
- journal requirements
- laboratory training
- reproductive medicine
- andrology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Standards in semen examination: publishing reproducible and reliable data based on high-quality methodology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS