Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Standardised test protocol (Constant Score) for evaluation of functionality in patients with shoulder disorders

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Danish expanded newborn screening is a successful preventive public health programme

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Analgesics use and withdrawal in people with dementia - a register-based Danish study and a systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  3. Everolimus as adjunctive treatment in tuberous sclerosis complex-associated epilepsy in children

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Protocol for a randomised clinical trial of transoral ultrasound versus standard of care in the diagnosis of peritonsillar abscess

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Regional and socioeconomic variation in survival of melanoma patients in Denmark

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations
INTRODUCTION:
The Constant Score (CS), developed as a scoring system to evaluate overall functionality of patients with shoulder disorders, is widely used but has been criticised for relying on an imprecise terminology and for lack of a standardised methodology. A modified guideline was therefore published in 2008 with several new recommendations, but a standardised test protocol was not included. Also, this new version has not been translated into Danish. The aims of the present study were to develop a standardised English test protocol for the newly modified CS, and to translate and cross-culturally adapt this version into Danish.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
An English test protocol was developed and translated into Danish at two independent centres according to international recommendations. Consensus on a preliminary version was achieved. The subjective part was tested on six patients, while two physiotherapists gave feedback on the objective part. Relevant items were culturally adapted and rephrased, and a simple standardised test protocol was developed.

RESULTS:
Only minor inconsistencies in the translations were found. A few questions and words had to be rephrased due to cultural and linguistic differences. One of the authors of the modified CS approved both the English and the Danish test protocol.

CONCLUSION:
A simple test protocol of the modified CS was developed in both English and Danish. With precise terminology and definitions, the test protocol is the first of its kind. We suggest its use internationally for standardised assessment of the CS. Testing of validity, reliability and responsiveness of both versions needs to be done in future research.

FUNDING:
not relevant.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:
not relevant.
Original languageEnglish
JournalDanish Medical Bulletin (Online)
Volume60
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)A4608
ISSN1603-9629
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013

ID: 38682093