Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Standardised and automated assessment of head computed tomography reliably predicts poor functional outcome after cardiac arrest: a prospective multicentre study

Margareta Lang, Martin Kenda, Michael Scheel, Juha Martola, Matthew Wheeler, Stephanie Owen, Mikael Johnsson, Martin Annborn, Josef Dankiewicz, Nicolas Deye, Joachim Düring, Hans Friberg, Thomas Halliday, Janus Christian Jakobsen, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou, Helena Levin, Gisela Lilja, Anna Lybeck, Peter McGuigan, Christian RylanderVictoria Sem, Matthew Thomas, Susann Ullén, Johan Undén, Matt P Wise, Tobias Cronberg, Johan Wassélius, Niklas Nielsen, Christoph Leithner, Marion Moseby-Knappe*

*Corresponding author for this work
20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: Application of standardised and automated assessments of head computed tomography (CT) for neuroprognostication after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

METHODS: Prospective, international, multicentre, observational study within the Targeted Hypothermia versus Targeted Normothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (TTM2) trial. Routine CTs from adult unconscious patients obtained > 48 h ≤ 7 days post-arrest were assessed qualitatively and quantitatively by seven international raters blinded to clinical information using a pre-published protocol. Grey-white-matter ratio (GWR) was calculated from four (GWR-4) and eight (GWR-8) regions of interest manually placed at the basal ganglia level. Additionally, GWR was obtained using an automated atlas-based approach. Prognostic accuracies for prediction of poor functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 4-6) for the qualitative assessment and for the pre-defined GWR cutoff < 1.10 were calculated.

RESULTS: 140 unconscious patients were included; median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR] 59-76), 76% were male, and 75% had poor outcome. Standardised qualitative assessment and all GWR models predicted poor outcome with 100% specificity (95% confidence interval [CI] 90-100). Sensitivity in median was 37% for the standardised qualitative assessment, 39% for GWR-8, 30% for GWR-4 and 41% for automated GWR. GWR-8 was superior to GWR-4 regarding prognostic accuracies, intra- and interrater agreement. Overall prognostic accuracy for automated GWR (area under the curve [AUC] 0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.91) did not significantly differ from manually obtained GWR.

CONCLUSION: Standardised qualitative and quantitative assessments of CT are reliable and feasible methods to predict poor functional outcome after cardiac arrest. Automated GWR has the potential to make CT quantification for neuroprognostication accessible to all centres treating cardiac arrest patients.

Original languageEnglish
JournalIntensive Care Medicine
Volume50
Issue number7
Pages (from-to)1096-1107
Number of pages12
ISSN0342-4642
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2024

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Female
  • Head/diagnostic imaging
  • Humans
  • Hypothermia, Induced/methods
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prognosis
  • Prospective Studies
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
  • GWR
  • Hypoxic–ischaemic encephalopathy
  • Cardiac arrest
  • Computed tomography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Standardised and automated assessment of head computed tomography reliably predicts poor functional outcome after cardiac arrest: a prospective multicentre study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this