Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Stakeholders in psychiatry and their attitudes toward receiving pertinent and incident findings in genomic research

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Clinical characteristics and quality of life, depression, and anxiety in adults with neurofibromatosis type 1: A nationwide study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Safety of switching to Migalastat from enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: Experience from the Phase 3 ATTRACT study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. First reported adult patient with TARP syndrome: A case report

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Ocular albinism with infertility and late-onset sensorineural hearing loss

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Capsid-like particles decorated with the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain elicit strong virus neutralization activity

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Comparison of 16 Serological SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassays in 16 Clinical Laboratories

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Determinants of intention to return to donate blood among first-time blood donors in Ghana

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. How donor selection criteria can be evaluated with limited scientific evidence: lessons learned from the TRANSPOSE project

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Increasingly more psychiatric research studies use whole genome sequencing or whole exome sequencing. Consequently, researchers face difficult questions, such as which genomic findings to return to research participants and how. This study aims to gain more knowledge on the attitudes among potential research participants and health professionals toward receiving pertinent and incidental findings. A cross-sectional online survey was developed to investigate the attitudes among research participants toward receiving genomic findings. A total of 2,637 stakeholders responded: 241 persons with mental disorders, 671 relatives, 1,623 blood donors, 74 psychiatrists, and 28 clinical geneticists. Stakeholders wanted both pertinent findings (95%) and incidental findings (91%) to be made available for research participants. The majority (77%) stated that researchers should not actively search for incidental findings. Persons with mental disorders and relatives were generally more positive about receiving any kind of findings than clinical geneticists and psychiatrists. Compared with blood donors, persons with mental disorders reported to be more positive about receiving raw genomic data and information that is not of serious health importance. Psychiatrists and clinical geneticists were less positive about receiving genomic findings compared with blood donors. The attitudes toward receiving findings were very positive. Stakeholders were willing to refrain from receiving incidental information if it could compromise the research. Our results suggest that research participants consider themselves as altruistic participants. This study offers valuable insight, which may inform future programs aiming to develop new strategies to target issues relating to the return of findings in genomic research.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A
Volume173
Issue number10
Pages (from-to)2649-2658
Number of pages10
ISSN1552-4825
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2017

    Research areas

  • Adult, Aged, Commerce, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Genetic Research, Genome, Human, Genomics, Humans, Incidental Findings, Male, Mental Disorders, Middle Aged, Psychiatry, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult, Journal Article

ID: 53565424