Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Should instrumented spinal fusion in nonambulatory children with neuromuscular scoliosis be extended to L5 or the pelvis?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Is tranexamic acid use in patients with a hip fracture safe?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. A comparison of conventional and minimally invasive multilevel surgery for children with diplegic cerebral palsy

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Revision risk after pediatric spinal deformity surgery: a nationwide study with 2-year follow-up

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Distraction-to-stall Versus Targeted Distraction in Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Minimal Access vs. Open Spine Surgery in Patients With Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression - A One-Center Randomized Controlled Trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Scheuermann's Kyphosis: a 39-year follow-up from diagnosis in non-operated patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewpeer-review

View graph of relations

AIMS: It is uncertain whether instrumented spinal fixation in nonambulatory children with neuromuscular scoliosis should finish at L5 or be extended to the pelvis. Pelvic fixation has been shown to be associated with up to 30% complication rates, but is regarded by some as the standard for correction of deformity in these conditions. The incidence of failure when comparing the most caudal level of instrumentation, either L5 or the pelvis, using all-pedicle screw instrumentation has not previously been reported. In this retrospective study, we compared nonambulatory patients undergoing surgery at two centres: one that routinely instrumented to L5 and the other to the pelvis.

METHODS: In all, 91 nonambulatory patients with neuromuscular scoliosis were included. All underwent surgery using bilateral, segmental, pedicle screw instrumentation. A total of 40 patients underwent fusion to L5 and 51 had their fixation extended to the pelvis. The two groups were assessed for differences in terms of clinical and radiological findings, as well as complications.

RESULTS: The main curve (MC) was a mean of 90° (40° to 141°) preoperatively and 46° (15° to 82°) at two-year follow-up in the L5 group, and 82° (33° to 116°) and 19° (1° to 60°) in the pelvic group (p < 0.001 at follow-up). Correction of MC and pelvic obliquity (POB) were statistically greater in the pelvic group (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the operating time, blood loss, or complications. Loss of MC correction (> 10°) was more common in patients fixated to the pelvis (23% vs 3%; p = 0.032), while loss of pelvic obliquity correction was more frequent in the L5 group (25% vs 0%; p = 0.007). Risk factors for loss of correction (either POB or MC) included preoperative coronal imbalance (> 50 mm, odds ratio (OR) 11.5, 95%confidence interval (CI) 2.0 to 65; p = 0.006) and postoperative sagittal imbalance (> 25 mm, OR 11.0, 95% CI1.9 to 65; p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION: We found that patients undergoing pelvic fixation had a greater correction of MC and POB. The rate of complications was not different. Preoperative coronal and postoperative sagittal imbalance were associated with increased risks of loss of correction, regardless of extent of fixation. Therefore, we recommend pelvic fixation in all nonambulatory children with neuromuscular scoliosis where coronal or sagittal imbalance are present preoperatively. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(2):261-267.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe bone & joint journal
Volume102-B
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)261-267
Number of pages7
ISSN2049-4394
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2020

    Research areas

  • Adolescent, Child, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery, Male, Mobility Limitation, Pedicle Screws, Retrospective Studies, Sacrum/surgery, Scoliosis/complications, Spinal Fusion/instrumentation, Treatment Outcome

ID: 62385519