Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Short-term outcome after Onstep versus Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair: results from a randomized clinical trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Treatment of longstanding groin pain: a systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. Reduced rate of incisional hernia after standardized fascial closure in emergency laparotomy

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Risk of incarceration in children with inguinal hernia: a systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Long-term mortality in the Intermediate care after emergency abdominal surgery (InCare) trial - a post-hoc follow-up study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. More than one-third of Cochrane reviews had gift authors, whereas ghost authorship was rare

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Group authorships in Cochrane had low compliance with Cochrane recommendations

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Half of Cochrane reviews were published more than 2 years after the protocol

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

PURPOSE: Because of the high number of patients with chronic pain following inguinal hernia repair, a new, simple and safe method of repair is needed. Onstep is a new type of inguinal hernia repair that might be able to reduce postoperative acute and chronic pain. The aim of this study was to investigate if there were differences in early postoperative pain during the first 10 days between the Onstep and the Lichtenstein technique.

METHODS: This was a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial conducted in five surgical departments in Denmark, from April 2013 to June 2014. Eligible participants for this study were male patients, >18 years, with a primary inguinal hernia. Experimental treatment in this study was the Onstep technique, which was compared with the Lichtenstein repair. Primary outcome was postoperative pain during the first 10 days following surgery. Secondary outcomes included duration of surgery, period for return to normal daily activities (days), and recurrence. Randomization was done in blocks and stratified on centers. Participants and study personnel handling questionnaires and analysis were blinded to the allocation.

RESULTS: In total, 290 participants were randomized. We found no significant differences between the groups regarding early postoperative pain or minor postoperative complications. Four patients had a recurrence within the first 10 days of follow-up, one patient in the Lichtenstein group and three patients in the Onstep group, p = 0.30.

CONCLUSION: The Onstep technique for inguinal hernia repair was safe and had comparable results to the Lichtenstein repair regarding short-term pain and postoperative complications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01753219).

Original languageEnglish
JournalHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery
Volume19
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)871-7
Number of pages7
ISSN1265-4906
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015

ID: 45992263