Short-term variability of Alzheimer's disease plasma biomarkers in a mixed memory clinic cohort

Frederikke Kragh Clemmensen*, Mathias Holsey Gramkow, Anja Hviid Simonsen, Nicholas J Ashton, Hanna Huber, Kaj Blennow, Henrik Zetterberg, Gunhild Waldemar, Steen Gregers Hasselbalch, Kristian Steen Frederiksen

*Corresponding author for this work
1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For clinical implementation of Alzheimer's disease (AD) blood-based biomarkers (BBMs), knowledge of short-term variability, is crucial to ensure safe and correct biomarker interpretation, i.e., to capture changes or treatment effects that lie beyond that of expected short-term variability and considered clinically relevant. In this study we investigated short-term intra- and inter-individual variability of AD biomarkers in the intended use population, memory clinic patients.

METHODS: In a consecutive sample of memory clinic patients (AD n = 27, non-AD n = 20), blood samples were collected on three separate days within a period of 36 days and analysed for plasma Aβ40, Aβ42, p-tau181, p-tau217, p-tau231, T-tau, neurofilament light (NfL), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). We measured intra- and inter-individual variability and explored if the variability could be affected by confounding factors. Secondly, we established the minimum change required to detect a difference between two given blood samples that exceeds intra-individual variability and analytical variation (reference change value, RCV). Finally, we tested if classification accuracy varied across the three visits.

RESULTS: Intra-individual variability ranged from ~ 3% (Aβ42/40) to ~ 12% (T-tau). Inter-individual variability ranged from ~ 7% (Aβ40) to ~ 39% (NfL). Adjusting the models for time, eGFR, Hba1c, and BMI did not affect the variation. RCV was lowest for Aβ42/Aβ40 (- ~ 15%/ + ~ 17%) and highest in p-tau181 (- ~ 30/ + ~ 42%). No variation in classification accuracies was found across visits.

CONCLUSION: We found low intra-individual variability, robust to various factors, appropriate to capture individual changes in AD BBMs, while moderate inter-individual variability may give rise to caution in diagnostic contexts. High RCVs may pose challenges for AD BBMs with low fold changes and consequently, short-term variability is important to take into consideration when, e.g., estimating intervention effect and longitudinal changes of AD BBM levels.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05175664), date of registration 2021-12-01.

Original languageEnglish
Article number26
JournalAlzheimer's research & therapy
Volume17
Issue number1
ISSN1758-9193
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Jan 2025

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Alzheimer Disease/blood
  • Biomarkers/blood
  • Female
  • Male
  • Aged
  • Amyloid beta-Peptides/blood
  • tau Proteins/blood
  • Cohort Studies
  • Middle Aged
  • Peptide Fragments/blood
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein/blood
  • Neurofilament Proteins/blood
  • Memory clinic cohort
  • Intra- and Inter-individual variability, Reference change value (RCV), Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, Phosphorylated tau (p-tau), Neurofilament light (NfL), Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)
  • Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers
  • Blood-based biomarkers
  • Short-term variability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Short-term variability of Alzheimer's disease plasma biomarkers in a mixed memory clinic cohort'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this