Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Shared Decision Making in an Integrated Mental Health and Vocational Rehabilitation Intervention: Stakeholder Practices and Experiences

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Instruments to assess integrated care: a systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Informal work and formal plans: articulating the active role of patients in cancer trajectories

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Motivation to take part in integrated care – an assessment of follow-up home visits to elderly persons

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Introduction: A Danish integrated mental health care and vocational intervention was developed to support the return-to-work process for people with common mental disorders. Shared decision making was a core element of the intervention to ensure a person-centred approach. The study aim is to describe how shared decision making was practiced and experienced and to discuss its potential in this integrated care context.

Theory and methods: Shared decision making practice and experience was studied in participant observation (n = 20), interviews (n = 12), focus groups interviews (n = 2), and shared plan documents (n = 12). Research methods and analyses were guided by theoretically defined ideals of shared decision making.

Results: Shared decision making constituted a general value rather than a structured method in practice. Clients experienced a more person-centred collaboration with professionals, compared to the regular vocational system. Contextual factors regarding vocational legislation and the intervention design influenced the decision latitude.

Conclusion: Shared decision making has the potential to support a person-centred approach in integrated services. However, we recommend clarifying decisions applicable for shared decision making, to ensure thorough training, develop and test decision aids, and ensure supportive organisational conditions for shared decision making in interprofessional collaboration.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1568-4156
JournalInternational Journal of Integrated Care
Volume20
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
ISSN1568-4156
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2020

ID: 61813379