Serum chromium levels sampled with steel needle versus plastic IV cannula. Does method matter?

Jeannette Ø Penny, Søren Overgaard

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: Modern metal-on-metal (MoM) joint articulations releases metal ions to the body. Research tries to establish how much this elevates metal ion levels and whether it causes adverse effects. The steel needle that samples the blood may introduce additional chromium to the sample thereby causing bias. This study aimed to test that theory. METHODS: We compared serum chromium values for two sampling methods, steel needle and IV plastic cannula, as well as sampling sequence in 16 healthy volunteers. RESULTS: We found statistically significant chromium contamination from the steel needle with mean differences between the two methods of 0.073 ng/mL, for the first sample, and 0.033 ng/mL for the second. No difference was found between the first and second plastic sample. The first steel needle sample contained an average of 0.047 ng/mL more than the second. This difference was only borderline significant. CONCLUSION: The chromium contamination from the steel needle is low, and sampling method matters little in MoM populations. If using steel needles we suggest discarding the first sample.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part B: Applied Biomaterials
Volume92
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)1-4
Number of pages3
ISSN1552-4973
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Serum chromium levels sampled with steel needle versus plastic IV cannula. Does method matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this