Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Self-Expanding or Balloon-Expandable TAVR in Patients with a Small Aortic Annulus

  • Howard C Herrmann
  • , Roxana Mehran
  • , Daniel J Blackman
  • , Stephen Bailey
  • , Helge Möllmann
  • , Mohamed Abdel-Wahab
  • , Walid Ben Ali
  • , Paul D Mahoney
  • , Hendrik Ruge
  • , David A Wood
  • , Sabine Bleiziffer
  • , Basel Ramlawi
  • , Hemal Gada
  • , Anna Sonia Petronio
  • , Charles D Resor
  • , William Merhi
  • , Bruno Garcia Del Blanco
  • , Guilherme F Attizzani
  • , Wayne B Batchelor
  • , Linda D Gillam
  • Mayra Guerrero, Toby Rogers, Joshua D Rovin, Molly Szerlip, Brian Whisenant, G Michael Deeb, Kendra J Grubb, Ratnasari Padang, Myra T Fan, Andrew D Althouse, Didier Tchétché, SMART Trial Investigators
276 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND Patients with severe aortic stenosis and a small aortic annulus are at risk for impaired valvular hemodynamic performance and associated adverse cardiovascular clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS We randomly assigned patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and an aorticvalve annulus area of 430 mm2 or less in a 1:1 ratio to undergo TAVR with either a self-expanding supraannular valve or a balloon-expandable valve. The coprimary end points, each assessed through 12 months, were a composite of death, disabling stroke, or rehospitalization for heart failure (tested for noninferiority) and a composite end point measuring bioprosthetic-valve dysfunction (tested for superiority). RESULTS A total of 716 patients were treated at 83 sites in 13 countries (mean age, 80 years; 87% women; mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality, 3.3%). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients who died, had a disabling stroke, or were rehospitalized for heart failure through 12 months was 9.4% with the self-expanding valve and 10.6% with the balloon-expandable valve (difference, -1.2 percentage points; 90% confidence interval [CI], -4.9 to 2.5; P<0.001 for noninferiority). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients with bioprosthetic- valve dysfunction through 12 months was 9.4% with the self-expanding valve and 41.6% with the balloon-expandable valve (difference, -32.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -38.7 to -25.6; P<0.001 for superiority). The aortic-valve mean gradient at 12 months was 7.7 mm Hg with the self-expanding valve and 15.7 mm Hg with the balloon-expandable valve, and the corresponding values for additional secondary end points through 12 months were as follows: mean effective orifice area, 1.99 cm2 and 1.50 cm2; percentage of patients with hemodynamic structural valve dysfunction, 3.5% and 32.8%; and percentage of women with bioprostheticvalve dysfunction, 10.2% and 43.3% (all P<0.001). Moderate or severe prosthesis- patient mismatch at 30 days was found in 11.2% of the patients in the self-expanding valve group and 35.3% of those in the balloon-expandable valve group (P<0.001). Major safety end points appeared to be similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with severe aortic stenosis and a small aortic annulus who underwent TAVR, a self-expanding supraannular valve was noninferior to a balloon-expandable valve with respect to clinical outcomes and was superior with respect to bioprostheticvalve dysfunction through 12 months.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe New England journal of medicine
Volume390
Issue number21
Pages (from-to)1959-1971
Number of pages13
ISSN0028-4793
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jun 2024

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Aortic Valve/surgery
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery
  • Bioprosthesis/adverse effects
  • Heart Failure
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Postoperative Complications/etiology
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Stroke/etiology
  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Self-Expanding or Balloon-Expandable TAVR in Patients with a Small Aortic Annulus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this