Self-esteem and social well-being of children with cochlear implant compared to normal-hearing children

Lone Percy-Smith, Per Cayé-Thomasen, Mette Gudman, Jørgen Hedegaard Jensen, Jens Thomsen

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to make a quantitative comparison of parameters of self-esteem and social well-being between children with cochlear implants and normal-hearing children.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were obtained from 164 children with cochlear implant (CI) and 2169 normal-hearing children (NH). Parental questionnaires, used in a national survey assessing the self-esteem and well-being of normal-hearing children, were applied to the cochlear implanted group, in order to allow direct comparisons.

RESULTS: The children in the CI group rated significantly higher on questions about well-being in kindergarten/school and the CI boys appeared to manage school work better than normal-hearing boys. CI children were significantly more active and bullied other children less than normal-hearing peers, whereas no difference existed as to being bullied by other children. No difference was obtained regarding overall self-esteem or number of friends. The two groups of children scored similarly on being confident, independent, social, not worried and happy.

CONCLUSION: Children with cochlear implant score equal to or better than their normal-hearing peers on matters of self-esteem and social well-being.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Volume72
Issue number7
Pages (from-to)1113-20
Number of pages8
ISSN0165-5876
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Cochlear Implants/psychology
  • Educational Status
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Interpersonal Relations
  • Male
  • Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology
  • Self Concept

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Self-esteem and social well-being of children with cochlear implant compared to normal-hearing children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this