Second malignancies in hydroxyurea and interferon-treated Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms

Iben Onsberg Hansen, Anders Lindholm Sørensen, Hans Carl Hasselbalch

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In an era of controversy in regard to 'hydroxyurea-leukaemogenicity' and when interferon-alfa2 (IFN) is being revived in the treatment of Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), we aim in this single-centre observational study to describe the frequencies of second malignancies in a cohort of MPN patients treated with hydroxyurea (HU) or IFN monotherapy or the combination of these agents.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records of a MPN cohort of 196 patients were reviewed, and a retrospective analysis was performed on 90 patients treated with HU, 38 patients treated with IFN and 68 patients treated with both IFN and HU. Logistic regression was used to compare frequencies in second malignancies.

RESULTS: Patients treated with HU had a significantly higher risk of developing all second malignancies compared with patients treated with IFN [HU vs. IFN: OR of 4.01 (95%CI: 1.12-14.27, P-value: 0.023) and HU-IFN vs. IFN: OR 5.58 (95%CI: 1.55-20.15, P-value: 0.004)].

CONCLUSION: We have found an increased risk of second malignancies in MPN patients treated with HU compared with patients treated with IFN.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Haematology
Volume98
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)75-84
Number of pages10
ISSN0902-4441
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Age of Onset
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Comorbidity
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hydroxyurea
  • Interferon-alpha
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myeloproliferative Disorders
  • Neoplasms, Second Primary
  • Odds Ratio
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Young Adult
  • Journal Article
  • Observational Study

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Second malignancies in hydroxyurea and interferon-treated Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this