Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Screening relatives in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: yield of imaging and electrical investigations

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Physical activity and coronary artery calcification

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

  2. Imaging in ESC clinical guidelines: chronic coronary syndromes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Impact of a decreasing pre-test probability on the performance of diagnostic tests for coronary artery disease

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

AIMS: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited disease and presymptomatic screening of relatives is recommended. In 2010, the Task Force Criteria (TFC2010) introduced specific diagnostic imaging parameters. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of family screening and the value of different diagnostic modalities.

METHODS AND RESULTS: Family evaluation, including cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), is routinely offered to ARVC relatives at our institution. We retrospectively registered baseline characteristics, symptomatology, and results of non-invasive examinations from 2010 to 2016 and assessed the findings according to TFC2010. A total of 286 relatives (150 females; age 12-76 years; 251 first-degree) were included. A total of 103 (36%) individuals reported cardiovascular symptoms. The non-invasive workup showed that 101 (35%) relatives had ≥1 positive parameter on signal-averaged electrocardiogram (ECG), 40 (14%) had abnormal findings on Holter monitoring, 36 (13%) fulfilled an ECG criterion, six (2%) fulfilled CMR criteria, and echocardiographic abnormalities was seen in one (0.3%) relative. In total, 21 (7% overall; 13% among gene-positive subgroup) relatives were diagnosed with ARVC and 78 (27% overall; 49% among gene-positive subgroup) with borderline ARVC based on the combined non-invasive evaluations. Family history and electrical investigations alone diagnosed 20 out of 21 (95%) ARVC cases and 73 out of 78 (94%) borderline cases.

CONCLUSION: Consecutive evaluation of ARVC relatives diagnosed 7% with definite and 27% with borderline ARVC according to the TFC2010. Screening relatives for electrical abnormalities with 12 lead ECG, signal-averaged ECG, and Holter monitoring was more sensitive than imaging modalities.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean heart journal cardiovascular Imaging
Volume21
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)175-182
ISSN1525-2167
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2020

    Research areas

  • ARVC, ECG, echocardiography, family screening, magnetic resonance imaging

ID: 58014211