Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger"

Siri Vinther; Ole Haagen Nielsen; Jacob Rosenberg; Niels Keiding; Torben V Schroeder

Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger"

Siri Vinther, Ole Haagen Nielsen, Jacob Rosenberg, Niels Keiding, Torben V Schroeder

Department of Gastroenterology

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research into the peer review process has previously been conducted in English-language journals. This study deals with a Danish general medical journal with a relatively small pool of both reviewers and readers. The aim of the study was to compare the quality of reviews produced by identifiable and anonymous reviewers, and further to characterize authors' and reviewers' attitudes towards different peer review systems.

Original language	English
Journal	Danish Medical Journal
Volume	59
Issue number	8
Pages (from-to)	A4479
Publication status	Published - 2012

Cite this

@article{f84cedd6651d487ea57f589013efb3bf,

title = "Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in {"}Ugeskrift for L{\ae}ger{"}",

abstract = "Research into the peer review process has previously been conducted in English-language journals. This study deals with a Danish general medical journal with a relatively small pool of both reviewers and readers. The aim of the study was to compare the quality of reviews produced by identifiable and anonymous reviewers, and further to characterize authors' and reviewers' attitudes towards different peer review systems.",

author = "Siri Vinther and Nielsen, \{Ole Haagen\} and Jacob Rosenberg and Niels Keiding and Schroeder, \{Torben V\}",

year = "2012",

language = "English",

volume = "59",

pages = "A4479",

journal = "Danish Medical Journal",

issn = "1603-9629",

publisher = "Almindelige Danske Laegeforening",

number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger"

AU - Vinther, Siri

AU - Nielsen, Ole Haagen

AU - Rosenberg, Jacob

AU - Keiding, Niels

AU - Schroeder, Torben V

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Research into the peer review process has previously been conducted in English-language journals. This study deals with a Danish general medical journal with a relatively small pool of both reviewers and readers. The aim of the study was to compare the quality of reviews produced by identifiable and anonymous reviewers, and further to characterize authors' and reviewers' attitudes towards different peer review systems.

AB - Research into the peer review process has previously been conducted in English-language journals. This study deals with a Danish general medical journal with a relatively small pool of both reviewers and readers. The aim of the study was to compare the quality of reviews produced by identifiable and anonymous reviewers, and further to characterize authors' and reviewers' attitudes towards different peer review systems.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84873105920

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 22849979

SN - 1603-9629

VL - 59

SP - A4479

JO - Danish Medical Journal

JF - Danish Medical Journal

IS - 8

ER -

Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger"

Abstract

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this