Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Risk of fetal loss associated with invasive testing following combined first-trimester screening for Down syndrome: a national cohort of 147 987 singleton pregnancies

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Neurodevelopmental disorder in children believed to have isolated mild ventriculomegaly prenatally

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. New intrauterine shunt for treatment of fetal fluid accumulation: single-center experience of first 17 cases

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

  1. Fetal fraction of cell-free DNA in pregnancies after fresh or frozen embryo transfer following assisted reproductive technologies

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. "It's probably nothing, but…" Couples' experiences of pregnancy following an uncertain prenatal genetic result

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Current use of noninvasive prenatal testing in Europe, Australia and the USA: A graphical presentation

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Implementation of exome sequencing in fetal diagnostics - data and experiences from a tertiary center in Denmark

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: To assess prospectively the risk of fetal loss associated with chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and amniocentesis (AC) following combined first-trimester screening (cFTS) for Down syndrome.

METHODS: This was a nationwide population-based study (Danish Fetal Medicine Database, 2008-2010) including 147 987 women with singleton pregnancy who underwent cFTS. Propensity score stratification was used to assess the risk of fetal loss with and without invasive testing. Analyses were performed between 3 and 21 days after cFTS for CVS and between 28 and 42 days after cFTS for AC. Results are reported as average risk differences with 95% CIs.

RESULTS: The risks of miscarriage and stillbirth were not higher in women exposed to CVS or AC compared with unexposed women, independent of the analysis time-point. The average effect of CVS on risk of miscarriage was -0.08% (95% CI, -0.64; 0.47) at 3 days and -0.21% (95% CI, -0.58; 0.15) at 21 days after cFTS, while the effect on risk of stillbirth was -0.18% (95% CI, -0.50; 0.13) at 3 days and -0.27% (95% CI, -0.58; 0.04) at 21 days after cFTS. Regarding the effect of AC on risk of miscarriage, the analysis at 28 days after cFTS showed an average effect of 0.56% (95% CI, -0.21; 1.33), while the effect on risk of stillbirth was 0.09% (95% CI, -0.39; 0.58) at 42 days after cFTS.

CONCLUSION: Neither CVS nor AC was associated with increased risk of miscarriage or stillbirth. These findings indicate that the procedure-related risk of CVS and AC is very low. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Original languageEnglish
JournalUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume47
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)38-44
Number of pages7
ISSN0960-7692
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2016

ID: 45971406