Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
E-pub ahead of print

Risk Models for Prediction of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Benefit: Insights From the DANISH Trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Exercise-Based Rehabilitation for Heart Failure: Cochrane Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Burden and Causes of Hospital Admissions in Heart Failure During the Last Year of Life

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Reply: Physical Activity and Fitness in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Ready for Prime Time?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Central and Peripheral Determinants of Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Long-Term Risk of Heart Failure in Breast Cancer Patients After Adjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without Trastuzumab

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Mechanical circulatory support for decompensated heart failure: the last remaining indication for intra-aortic balloon pump?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Polygenic predisposition to breast cancer and the risk of coronary artery disease

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Cardiovascular Manifestations of Systemic Sclerosis: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify patients with nonischemic heart failure who are more likely to benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation by use of established risk prediction models.

BACKGROUND: It has been debated whether an ICD for primary prevention reduces mortality in patients with nonischemic heart failure.

METHODS: The Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) predicts all-cause mortality whereas the Seattle Proportional Risk Model (SPRM) predicts the proportion of sudden cardiac death (SCD) versus nonsudden death, with a higher score indicating a greater proportion of SCD. We report the effect of ICD implantation on all-cause mortality and SCD, according to median SPRM and SHFM scores in all 1,116 patients enrolled in the DANISH (Danish study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients with Non-ischemic Systolic Heart Failure on mortality) trial.

RESULTS: Among patients with an SPRM score above the median (n = 558), ICD implantation reduced all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43 to 0.94), whereas patients with lower SPRM scores (n = 558) had no effect (HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.78 to 1.49, p for interaction = 0.04). The corresponding numbers for SHFM score above and below the median were HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.13 and HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.28, respectively (p for interaction = 0.980). In 177 patients with upper SPRM/upper SHFM, ICD implantation reduced all-cause mortality (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.80) when compared to 381 patients with lower SPRM/upper SHFM (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.55) (p for interaction < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: Nonischemic heart failure patients with high predicted relative likelihood of SCD, as estimated by higher SPRM score, seemed to benefit from ICD implantation. (DANISH [Danish ICD Study in Patients With Ditaled Cardiomyopathy]; NCT00542945).

Original languageEnglish
JournalJACC. Heart failure
ISSN2213-1779
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Jul 2019

ID: 57662030