Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Risk Factors for and Prediction of a Difficult Neuraxial Block: A Cohort Study of 73,579 Patients from the Danish Anaesthesia Database

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. The PANSAID Randomized Clinical Trial: A pre-planned 1-year follow-up regarding harm

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Response

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. The handling oxygenation targets in the intensive care unit (HOT-ICU) trial: Detailed statistical analysis plan

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Intraindividual variation of the transversus abdominis plane block: an exploratory study in healthy volunteers

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: A difficult neuraxial block (DNB) may be associated with complications. The aims of this study were to estimate the prevalence of DNB, assess patient-related and organizational factors associated with DNB, and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an accumulated risk score for predicting DNB.

METHODS: A consecutive cohort of 73,579 patients was retrieved. A predefined DNB score and information on patient-related and organizational factors were included in the analyses. Logistic regression analysis was performed. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of an accumulated weighted point score of the patient-related risk factors of DNB.

RESULTS: The prevalence of DNB and abandoned neuraxial block was 3.9 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3.7-4.0) and 0.2 (95% CI, 0.16-0.22), respectively. Body mass index of 35 or higher and previous DNB were associated with DNB, with 3.23 (95% CI, 2.87-3.65) and 2.00 (95% CI, 1.33-3.00), respectively. However, the remaining patient-related covariates were associated with DNB with substantial lower odds ratios. The diagnostic accuracy of an accumulated sum score demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.61-0.64), a positive predictive value of 5%, and a positive likelihood ratio of 1.4.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite of strong statistical association between DNB and the tested risk factors, the low odds ratios and estimates of the diagnostic test indicate that the clinical impact using an accumulated risk sum score is limited.

Original languageEnglish
JournalRegional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
Volume40
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)545-552
ISSN1098-7339
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jul 2015

ID: 45544121