Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Revision after shoulder replacement for acute fracture of the proximal humerus

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty - have we reached the goal?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Rebound pain following peripheral nerve block anaesthesia in acute ankle fracture surgery: An exploratory pilot study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Phalanxfrakturer på hånd

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Good midterm results of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Background and purpose - For more than half a century, stemmed hemiarthroplasty (SHA) has been used in the treatment of comminuted and displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has been increasingly popular in cases where it is difficult to obtain satisfactory fixation of the tuberosities. We report revision rates and reasons for revision after shoulder arthroplasty for acute fractures of the proximal humerus. Patients and methods - This study was based on a common dataset from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA), which includes data reported to the national shoulder arthroplasty registries in Denmark, Sweden, and Norway. We included 6,756 shoulder arthroplasties performed for acute fractures between 2004 and 2013. Results - There were 6,112 SHAs (90%) and 565 RSAs (8.4%). The cumulative arthroplasty survival rate after 5 years was 0.96 for both SHA and RSA. The relative risk of revision of RSA was 1.4 (95% CI: 0.9-2.2) with SHA as reference. For both types of arthroplasty, the most common reason for revision was infection (SHA 0.8%, RSA 2.1%). The relative risk of revision due to infection was 3.1 (95% CI: 1.6-5.9) for RSA with SHA as reference. The relative risk of revision for patients who were less than 75 years of age was 2.8 (95% CI: 2.0-3.8) compared to older patients. Interpretation - Revision after shoulder arthroplasty for acute fractures was rare. Survival rates were similar between SHA and RSA, but RSA had a statistically significant and clinically relevant higher risk of revision because of infection.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Orthopaedica (Print Edition)
Volume88
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)446-450
Number of pages5
ISSN1745-3674
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2017

    Research areas

  • Age Factors, Aged, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder, Denmark, Female, Humans, Male, Norway, Prosthesis Failure, Prosthesis-Related Infections, Registries, Reoperation, Risk Factors, Shoulder Fractures, Sweden, Journal Article

ID: 51616821