Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Restoring the Sense of Smell: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Biologic Therapies for Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

Christian K Pedersen*, Vibeke Backer, Jens Even Tidemandsen, Simon Høj, Marie Høxbro, Anne-Sophie Homøe, Kasper Aanæs, Christian von Buchwald

*Corresponding author for this work
1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Smell loss is among the most debilitating symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). We aimed to synthesize current evidence on the smell-restoring efficacy of biologics, focusing on outcomes measured by psychophysical tests.

RECENT FINDINGS: Biologics mark a paradigm shift in the management of refractory CRSwNP, offering targeted, effective and safe treatment options. However, their relative impact on psychophysical smell outcomes remains uncertain. With several biologics now approved and real-world evidence emerging, a comprehensive evaluation is needed. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of 8 RCTs (n = 2,024) and an additional review of 20 cohorts (n = 1,685). Among RCTs, biologic treatment produced a moderate to large pooled improvement in psychophysical smell scores (standardized mean difference, [SMD] = 0.72 (95% CI 0.32-1.13), p = 0.0004). The effect differed between drugs (χ² = 23.95, p < 0.0002). Dupilumab showed the largest improvements across four RCTs (SMD = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.35-1.97). In single RCTs, benralizumab showed large effect (1.03, 0.55-1.51), tezepelumab (0.56, 0.46-0.67), telikibart (0.35, 0.11-0.59), and omalizumab (0.27, 0.15-0.40) yielded modest but significant improvements. Mepolizumab showed no effect (0.1330 (95% CI -0.2490-0.5150). Blood-eosinophil level correlated with treatment response (p < 0.001). The cohort studies supported the findings (SMD = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.99-1.42), though most data were derived from studies of dupilumab. Overall, biologics substantially improve psychophysically measured olfactory function in CRSwNP. Future head-to-head trials are warranted to delineate comparative efficacy of smell recovery.

Original languageEnglish
Article number54
JournalCurrent Allergy and Asthma Reports
Volume25
Issue number1
ISSN1529-7322
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Nov 2025

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Sinusitis/drug therapy
  • Rhinitis/drug therapy
  • Nasal Polyps/drug therapy
  • Chronic Disease
  • Smell/drug effects
  • Biological Therapy/methods
  • Biological Products/therapeutic use
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Olfaction Disorders/etiology
  • Rhinosinusitis
  • Rhinosinusitis/complications
  • Type-2 inflammation
  • Smell loss
  • Olfaction
  • Monoclonal antibodies
  • Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'RETRACTED ARTICLE: Restoring the Sense of Smell: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Biologic Therapies for Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this